I've been wondering this question for a while. Ignoring current events, why is a little bit of inflation desirable?

I do understand that it's done to "stimulate" the economy so people don't let their cash rot in a checking account, but isn't it a zero-sum game? Everybody says that money is not meant to stay where it is, rather, should flow through the economy. But if the economy always needs injections of liquidity because otherwise it fails, isn't the economy broken?

I feel like there's something I can't comprehend about that.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 10 hours ago (1 child)

This is the best answer. At just 2% inflation, by the time you're paying off that 30-year bond, it only costs 50%. Government can stay in perpetual debt, pumping money into the private economy, and inflation effectively pays off the debt.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

    yes, but this also assumes growth. you can have poor or no growth, and that introduce other problems with government debt.

    and governments are not 'debtors' they hold debt, yes, but they can also manipulate the economy directly through politics and policy. your average person in debt, can't do that.

    another fatal mistake people make is thinking government debt, business debt, and personal debt, are all the same. they aren't. they all have different rules and different mechanisms for how they are assessed and businesses can do things people can't.

  • source
  • parent