Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has accused establishment Democrats of treating her “like shit” as progressive activists urged her to run for president in 2028.

In a 100-minute long video posted on Instagram, the 37-year-old congresswoman from New York said that the party had a “remarkable opportunity” to pass left-wing policies after the midterm elections. She also accused the party’s leadership of starving funds from left-wing candidates during the campaign.

“There’s this huge conversation about candidates that were under invested in,” Ocasio-Cortez said. She cited Angie Nixon, a member of the Democratic Socialists of America who came within 240,000 votes of flipping Florida from red to blue, but ultimately lost to the Republican candidate Ashley Moody.

“If Angie Nixon had just had a little bit of that support, that outcome could have changed. But that money has to come from somewhere and it comes from these people,” Ocasio-Cortez said in reference to the party’s Senate leadership.

Reflecting on the period after she was first elected to Congress in 2018 at the age of 29, Ocasio-Cortez accused senior Democrats of being “horrifically cruel” to her. “I mean I was treated like shit,” she said. “Everybody took a swing at me.”

The Bronx congresswoman is seen as the likeliest progressive candidate to run for the Democratic nomination for president in 2028.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

Yeah I like AOC and would vote for her, but I don't think 2028 is her year. She has a lot of qualities that each individually could lose support: she's a woman, non-white, vocally progressive, relatively young, only a Rep, and has a long history of demonization by the right.

None of those traits is particularly damning alone (to the general population, I don't have a problem with any of it personally), but taken together that's a lot of hill to climb.

I'd like to see her go for a couple terms in the Senate, which would take care of the "relatively young" and "only a Rep". Plus, hopefully the landscape shifts more progressive which would make her less of an outlier.

I think 47 year old Senator Cortez is a much better bet than 39 year old Representative Cortez, and I'd rather not spoil the former by pushing the latter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

    I feel like she could win anyway. She's just a natural star politician. It's a mix of things: the model looks, the clear explanation of policy, the fact that she is relatable in a way so many are not. I think she'd easily win. I think she'd even do okay with the racists... she's just that likable. Why not have 2028 be her year? If not 2028, when? There's always a reason among corporate elite conservative Democrats to avoid someone too helpful to the poor and middle class, isn't there?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

    I don't disagree with her positives, I just think she's on the young side to win in 2028.

    I think she'd even do okay with the racists... she's just that likable.

    I think you underestimate how much the right wing media has demonized her. I like her, you like her, but a lot of people think she's a dumb waitress.

    Why not have 2028 be her year? If not 2028, when?

    2036, after a stint in the Senate. She'll be older, she'll have experience in the Upper House, it's just a much better position for a win.

    There's always a reason among corporate elite conservative Democrats to avoid someone too helpful to the poor and middle class, isn't there?

    This isn't about corporate Democrats, this is about progressives acting strategically. I think it would be much better to run an established progressive Senator or Governor in 2028.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 16 hours ago* (1 child)

    I think you underestimate how much the right wing media has demonized her. I like her, you like her, but a lot of people think she’s a dumb waitress.

    Give her the podium to debate a Republican on national TV. No one will think that anymore. It's easily dealt with, even an advantage. They don't know her yet, so Republicans think many USA Americans hate her. But she is great, middle America just doesn't know yet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 15 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

    I disagree. Yes, I like her, but you're extremely optimistic about how middle America will react. I fear that your perception is biased by surrounding yourself with progressives, not that I blame you. I implore you to spend more time talking to "average" Americans. A very large number don't respect her, and think she's not even qualified for the House. Never mind her credentials, they think she's a dumb commie waitress.

    Many people are going to think that no matter what. I wish it were otherwise, but people talk to me about their political views. She is a very controversial figure. This isn't speculation, this is talking to actual people about what they believe.

    I want her to run, and I want her to win. And the last thing I want is for her to jump the gun on an early run and ruin her future chances. I would've liked to see Walz run, but the Harris campaign is an albatross around his neck. I do not want her to suffer the same fate, I want her to actually win when she runs.

    Again, she would be 39 in '28. That's four years younger than JFK, the youngest person ever elected President. That's going to be too young for a lot of people.

  • source
  • parent