-8
Emacs core devs says FOSS and Emacs "must" support slavery. What's the fork? (lists.gnu.org)
submitted 2 days ago by to c/emacs@programming.dev
3 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The case is already making some news: in the context of LLM / "AI" contributions to Emacs and to Free Software in general, a core dev of Emacs made the statement that Emacs, and FOSS in general, "must" support code or contributions generated via slavery.

Responses, of course, are ongoing.

What is the fork if Emacs turns out to have been turned into a fascist playground just like so many other projects? The surrounding context suggests one: "Human Emacs".

[1] https://www.flyingpenguin.com/gnu-maintainer-slave-made-code-yes/ [2] https://mathstodon.xyz/@divyaranjan/117581331940423337

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 1 day ago*

Let me guess: another smear campaign against RMS, some guy asked a stupid philosophical question, eli answered to that question, and people think GNU supports slavery? People are really stupid.

we limit ourselves to solving a few of the problems

Pretty reasonable.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •