Los Angeles (United States) (AFP) – California voters have rejected a one-time tax on billionaires, US media projected on Monday, despite growing anger over global wealth disparity.

The tax would have forced around 200 billionaires in the state to cough up five percent of their total net worth, with the money largely dedicated to helping pay for healthcare.

CNN and CBS News both projected that so-called Proposition 40 would not pass, nearly a week after voters cast ballots on whether to tax the billionaires.

With the highest population of any US state, California is notoriously slow at counting votes.

Prop 40 was one of a bevy of proposals put to voters in last week's midterm elections, which delivered large-scale victories across the nation for the Democratic Party, and handed a drubbing to President Donald Trump's Republicans.

The proposal was unveiled to fanfare in California, a state that would be the world's fourth largest economy if it were a country, but one in which there is a yawning gulf between the haves and the have-nots.

It was seen by wealth tax proponents as a key part of a global effort to tackle growing income inequality.

But the tax already appeared to be headed for defeat last week, with about 60 percent of votes counted on Wednesday showing that "No" was leading by 55.6 percent to 44.4 percent.

...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9 points 1 day ago (1 child)

Californian voters are so illiterate. That prop was shittily written but there were a good number of voter guides ro explain it in straight forward terms and voters didn't bother to look.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

    True, somewhat, regular people here in CA need time to learn stuff. Pressing folks for time and a inundating 5 months of ad noise to learn a local issue compounds that; forcing people to make uneducated votes.

    Compounding further, officials aren't (for some reason) doing the necessary long studies to have that as a permanent tax. As in other countries with a wealth tax has had a good history to do so.

    The fact the vote landed almost half-half means nobody knows the wide consequential terminal detriments of capitalism; and wealthy have taken advantage, again.

  • source
  • parent