While I kind of agree, your own reply is even worse...

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

I guess you can’t make an old dog… eat new dicks.

If you ever feel like updating your incredibly obsolete, outdated 15 year old skillset, check out Hack and watch this video about why it was necessary to clean up the (in his view egregious) sins of PHP developers working on the same codebase simultaneously at Meta. Then report back exactly where I’m wrong in regards to PHP’s safety.

I have a thick skin. I don’t mind being educated about it and I would’t mind admitting I’m wrong.
I’m not holding out hope that you can easily switch to a style where you display intellectual honesty after that uproarious response.

According to the conversation linked and my real world observations, PHP devs do stupid, unsafe, outdated shit with inline dependency injection the likes of which I haven’t seen anywhere other than C’s include paradigm. Again, I’d be ecstatic if you could prove me wrong with something other than childish insults. Even if you make it vulgar but fact based I’ll listen (it’ll be entertaining!). I’m here to learn (and shame devs that stick with outdated technologies long past their time).

I don't fully buy that. The commit history shows a lot of slopisms and large changes in one go, the design itself is the go-to LLM design (you'd think someone with 15 years of experience would make a more inspired design), and, one of the biggest indicators of LLM usage is in the code, which is the overuse of meaningless comments. Comments that are just there to leave a comment, complete with things like "[X]: not [Y]". It does look, at the very least, LLM assisted, if not entirely vibe coded.

Also, this claim of your is completely worthless. Lots of 15-20 year developers use LLMs. Your personal insults do not help your case.