you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 71 points 16 hours ago* (5 children)

This might possibly be the stupidest goddamn thing I have read recently, obvious rage bait for the young, and when I see it in the wild I always ask myself, why? To what end?

So I went looking at the user history, which is a five-day old account with exactly one contribution, this odd post. I also happened to notice that the username initials, RBC, match the name of the article site, rathbiotaclan.com.

In the last year especially, young people -- Gen Z -- have been forcing sweeping changes around the world, overturning authoritarian regimes and protesting obscene genocide. They're on the right side of history. But now I'm supposed to think I'm smarter because I'm old and they're somehow "less intelligent." Lol, no. They are doing what they can with what they have, same as the rest of us ever did or will do, and frankly they're doing a lot better for the world than their elders are these days.

In that light, look at how much this one article sets commenters of all ages against each other, just in this thread. I can see no other purpose for its existence, honestly.

Don't fall for this kind of attempt to divide. Those in power are going to amp up their attempt to set groups of people against each other, and I expect to see even more of this kind of divisive horseshit in the near future. Don't fall for it. Remember who you are: a human being with the same innate qualities of those who went before you, and will come after. We are all what we make of ourselves, in the exact circumstances individual to each of us.

IQ is bullshit. The ONLY war is class war -- which, incidentally, is what they were saying in the 60s too, and long before that.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 hours ago (1 child)

    The title is misleading, it should not say "intelligent" it should say "educated". The science does not indicate that somehow Gen Z is uniquely bad at being educated, but that our education system is losing the war for students' attention. The science does show that when you make adjustments like removing tech from classrooms, younger generations are just as educable as any other generation.

    This should be the takeaway we all recognize and agree needs to be addressed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 hours ago

    As a label for the actual contents of the article, the title is perfect. Here's the start, a base topic from which the article itself never diverges (emphases mine):

    Gen Z intelligence decline is emerging as a serious concern among neuroscientists and education researchers. For over a century, each generation showed rising IQ scores, a pattern known as the Flynn effect. New data from the U.S., Europe, and global assessments now suggest this trend may be reversing raising urgent questions about how modern environments are shaping the developing brain.

    In January 2026, a U.S. Senate hearing delivered a startling claim. Cognitive neuroscientist Dr. Jared Cooney Horvath testified that Generation Z those born roughly between 1997 and 2012 may be the first generation in modern history to show lower cognitive performance than their parents at the same age. According to Horvath, this decline is not anecdotal or cultural pessimism; it is measurable across IQ, memory, literacy, numeracy, attention, and problem-solving abilities.

    For more than a century, human intelligence appeared to move in only one direction: upward. Now, multiple datasets from across the globe suggest that this long-standing trend has stalled—or even reversed. Researchers call this phenomenon the reverse Flynn effect, and its implications could shape education, innovation, and society for decades to come.

    The article continues on in this fashion. Education is not directly discussed except in terms of test scores; it is entirely secondary to various factors, like "IQ points," that the author would have us believe add up to intelligence.

    You didn't actually read it, did you.

  • source
  • parent