189
Asahi Linux Drops MIT and Goes Full GPL After AI Tools Were Used to Steal Unreleased Code (itsfoss.com)
submitted 16 hours ago by to c/opensource@programming.dev
67 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

I misunderstood your initial point, I thought you were speaking against permissive/copyleft licenses generally. We agree with one another. Except in the "I can be sure that the technology and code will be freely shared" because just as bad actors can abuse a permissive license, bad actors (see: companies with enough money to just squash the legal case) can simply ignore a copyleft license. I think we 99% agree though and I love copyleft.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 10 hours ago (1 child)

    because just as bad actors can abuse a permissive license, bad actors

    You are right, but with copyleft you at least have legal mechanisms to force the company to comply with the license. With MIT or BSD there aren't any, because permissive licences don't enforce any such restrictions.

    I think we 99% agree though and I love copyleft.

    Yup. And I love copyleft too.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 8 hours ago

    Permissive is the opposite of copyleft. Permissive is "here's my code, do whatever the fuck you want", copyleft is "here's my code, you may use it but if your derivative work is available to other people then I dictate how it must be licensed"

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent