According to the article, her "process" is just doing multiple pass with AI, then having a human proofread to fix any "AI tells that have slipped through" and do some rewriting.

So, yeah, it is slop. Her goals are not to write books, but to make money by selling products to certain readers based on rigorous market research. She is also revealing that she use AI only when required by the platform.

To people that defend this heavy use of AI as she is, I always have the following arguments:

• If every authors start generating books using AI like she is, then her books will literally become invisible, drowned in a sea of slops.
• If AI can generate a book by itself, then why should I waste my time reading her slops when I could have AI generate some for me trailered to my likes.

I just feel like this heavy use of AI can only lead to the ruin of all artistic endeavour, be it movies, games, books, musics, etc.