I just finished a PhD in stats, and before that, studied computer science. I had planned to go back to industry to do software engineering or be a data scientist afterwards.

However, it seems that in the meantime, vibe coding has taken over the software industry and swallowed most data scientist roles. Few open positions, and the ones that do exist are just pushing a button instead of thinking and solving problems. Is this a correct assessment? Should I try to get back in or just find a new career? I am not too keen on staying in academia either.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 7 hours ago (1 child)

Maybe I miss understand what "extrapolate" means in your context. To me that means "extract the core idea and explain/apply them", as AI do not learn by producing output (unlike human), applying core idea requires it to be explained in clear language.

I was arguing that AI, at present, cannot effectively extract core idea which is what I would characterize as "extrapolate".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • No, by "extrapolate" I mean to learn a pattern in the training data and then apply that pattern (in a useful way) to a problem outside the domain of the training data. An AI that cannot extrapolate would only be able to do the specific things that it had been taught to do, whereas an AI that can extrapolate is capable of solving new problems.

    As for the language, I suspect that it is clear to the AI itself. During their training, programming AIs communicate with other programming AIs more than they do with humans, so they develop their own dialect of sorts which is good for exchanging information among themselves. This is just conjecture on my part, but my evidence is that if the AI really was internally confused about those math problems, it wouldn't have been able to solve them.

  • source
  • parent