vice.com Why the Actor Who Played Buffalo Bill in ‘The Silence of the Lambs’ Has a Problem With the Movie Today Tony Alpsen 2–3 minutes

35 years after The Silence of the Lambs premiered in theaters, the topic of Buffalo Bill’s sexual identity remains a contentious one. The deranged serial killer, played by Ted Levine in the film, was known for skinning his female victims in order to stitch together a “woman suit” for himself. This past February, Levine weighed in on the subject, and it turns out he’s got conflicting feelings about his performance.

“There are certain aspects of the movie that don’t hold up too well,” Levine, who’d never addressed the controversy before, told The Hollywood Reporter. “We all know more, and I’m a lot wiser about transgender issues,” he continued. “There are some lines in that script and movie that are unfortunate.” 35 Years Later, ‘The Silence of the Lambs’ Star Says the Movie Got Something Important Wrong

Levine went on to say that he didn’t have those same concerns when he made the movie, but is more knowledgeable when it comes to the trans experience nowadays. “[It’s] just over time and having gotten aware and worked with trans folks, and understanding a bit more about the culture and the reality of the meaning of gender,” he explained. “It’s unfortunate that the film vilified that, and it’s f—king wrong. And you can quote me on that.”

The actor also said that he didn’t play Buffalo Bill as gay or trans and just saw him as a “f—ked-up heterosexual man.” Director Jonathan Demme shared a similar view of the character, saying that Bill only wanted to be a woman because it was his way of escaping. Producer Edward Saxon confirmed that the intent was never for Bill to be trans. “He was sick. To that extent, we missed it. From my point of view, we weren’t sensitive enough to the legacy of a lot of stereotypes and their ability to harm,” Saxon added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 39 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Not sure if I will catch heat for this, but…

Silence of the Lambs is in my top 5. I’ve always interpreted Bill as someone who is not trans, but rather part of his pathology is a misplaced identity issue. He wanted to become what he coveted; he did not feel that he was a woman, but that he wanted to transform into a woman. A point without distinction? Idk, it’s hard for me to verbalize it properly. He tried to get GCS, because that was what many trans folks aspire to, and when they turned him away, he pulled a “Fine, I’ll do it myself”. He sees killing as just another step in the process of constructing his own transformation. There does seem to be some sort of sexual gratification involved, but I think that is just a bonus for him.

This is just my interpretation of it. I could be off base, but it still remains in my top 5. I can definitely understand why others would think that my take is spicy at best. I think we all have some piece of media that we are willing to overlook problematic aspects of it.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child)

    The movie explicitly states your interpretation is exactly what's going on with Billy. The terminology they use could charitably called "dated at best", but here's the relevant dialogue:

    Hannibal Lecter: Billy is not a real trans-sexual, but he thinks he is. He tries to be. He's tried to be a lot of things, I expect.

    Clarice Starling: And you said that I was very close to the way we would catch him. What did you mean, doctor?

    Hannibal Lecter: There are three major centers for trans-sexual surgery: Johns Hopkins, the University of Minnesota, and Columbus Medical Center. I wouldn't be surprised if Billy had applied for sex reassignment at one or all of them, and been rejected.

    Clarice Starling: On what basis would they reject him?

    Hannibal Lecter: Look for severe childhood disturbances associated with violence. Our Billy wasn't born a criminal, Clarice. He was made one through years of systematic abuse. Billy hates his own identity, you see, and he thinks that makes him a trans-sexual. But his pathology is a thousand times more savage and more terrifying.

    Billy knows he's a delusional, violent psychopath and predator. He hates it and desperately wants to be something else.

    Billy probably settled on "woman" because in his mind "woman" is the exact polar opposite of what he is.

    ... But Billy is a delusional, violent psychopathic predator and therefore goes about that "transformation" in a completely expected way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

    I agree with you. I just want to add that I think people put way too much thought into the id fuck me scene. He's fucked up and in a good mood. Course he's fuck himself. I never took it as he wants to be a woman (but it's awhile and I could be misremembering.).

    Edit: reading all the other comments I guess I'm half wrong. He wants to be trans? I still think he was just in a really good mood for the id fuck me scene.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    I don’t think the film is hateful or a bad portrayal. It’s nuanced and adresses topics around gender that are worth discussing. Unfortunately the current discourse around trans people is rancid and we’re just not thoughtful enough as a society to be entrusted with nuance on this topic. It’s not a bad thing to like SotL, and it doesn’t make you anti-trans, but the overall effect of the movie on public discourse has been negative and I’d argue it was a little irresponsible of Thomas Harris and the filmmakers to release it as-is in the current context.

    Hopefully it’s simply ahead of its time and we can eventually enjoy nice things like nuance when we someday pull our collective heads out of our asses.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    The current discourse is rancid? Back then, we didn't talk about trans people, let alone acknowledge they exist. It's not that the topic was distasteful or taboo, the topic didn't exist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago*

    The comment about 3 major medical centers tells part of the story-- there were only a handful of places in the country that provided modern (for the time), safe, and comprehensive medical care/procedures for trans people.

    Cross dresser, drag queen, or transexual were the terms people knew and they were all interchangeable (in most people's minds) for "homosexual man that dresses like a woman" and widely considered either a fetish, mental illness, or deviancy.

    This is in a society where run-of-the-mill homophobia was openly accepted and celebrated.

  • source
  • parent