Incoming senators are nearly 15 years younger than departing ones, on average. But the chamber’s overall age isn’t shifting much.

Nov. 7, 2026Updated 3:17 p.m. ET

When the new Senate convenes in January, it will welcome some (relatively) young new legislators. A few are even millennials, including James Talarico of Texas, 37, and Abdul El-Sayed of Michigan, 42, two Democrats who may have energized young voters to turn out.

But their effect on the average age of the Senate — which has crept up over the last few decades — will be small. The senators of the 120th Congress will be less than a year younger, on average, than the Senate’s current members were at the start of the 119th Congress two years ago. That’s because so many sitting senators are old, and getting older.

These numbers assume that Mary Peltola and Scott Colom will win their races in Alaska and Mississippi; they were both ahead in the vote count Saturday. (If both lose, the Senate’s average age will land at 63.6.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 37 points 3 days ago (11 children)

65 should be the maximum for newly elected officials, forced retirement at 70, and strict term limits. They can hold advisory roles after that, but should be excluded from directly making decisions which they’ll never experience the consequences of.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 days ago* (2 children)

    I say the oldest you can serve as an elected official should be 62, which is when the government itself says it's time to withdraw social security benefits.

    At the very least apply term limits for senators, governors, and judges.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 days ago* (1 child)

    The actual full retirement age to start taking Social Security without a penalty is 67. You can start taking it as early as age 62, but that's with a significant penalty so the amount you get per month will be permanently a lower number. If you wait until after 67 you would be rewarded with a higher monthly amount, which maxes out at age 70.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago

    I was aware of that. My whole point is that 62 is the age the government decided when citizens can start to access retirement benefits, well then that's when elected officials should serve their term by.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 days ago (4 children)

    Don't set a definitive age. Pin it to some percentage of life expectancy; say, 90%. Want to stay in office longer? Make it so everyone lives longer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 days ago* (2 children)

    imagine giving a shit about something other than yourself and planting trees whose shade you will never know, or having pride in creating a better world. lol cuck shit.

    obviously we shouldn't let people like that make our decisions at any age.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    If those were the gerontocrats we were dealing with, nobody would be concerned about this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • kind of my point; don't be fucking ageist. these are monsters. they were monsters at age twenty, they are monsters today, and they will be corpses in ten or fewer years unless they get a LOT of blood boys, which they will absolutely try to do.

    a 20 year old version of these guys is still raping children sucking off corpos and flaying homeless orphaned kittens for fun. you want actually good people or at least egotistical jerks who want to do good stuff to he remembered good. you want the kinds of people who become whatever flavor of communist.

  • source
  • parent