you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 121 points 1 year ago (7 children)

It's "more secure" because there's a specific company to blame when it goes wrong.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Yeah, i worked briefly at multinational japanese motor company and this was their logic. I was hired as a software developer contractor and HQ had rules stating, no open source software, no free software and the one that puzzled me the most no in house executables (WHY THE FUCK DID THEY HIRE ME?)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    That would make some sense if the company was purchasing a solution, not a tool. Or a contract/SaaS model or something. Instead, it's like banning known screwdriver brands and expecting people to still have no problem loosening and tightening screws...

  • source
  • parent