you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Still doesn't make sense. Earth has low radiation to support life...
Even building a supporting passive cooling, water recycling + solar farm in a desert would cost less than unnumbered trips to the Moon and back. Switch is doing "fine" in the Nevada desert...
You need some maintenance crew to keep alive, you need to feed them (tho with their robotics maybe not).
Plus you would need to have the data transferred back to Earth - without letting the enemy reading / decoding it over time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 days ago (3 children)

    One other big reason is that datacenters are war targets and risk of espionage on the moon is low

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • The thing with any moon infrastructure is that you first need to front an enormous investment to get it to the point where it's still more expensive than just doing stuff on earth. Until you can produce the heavier components there it's going to be pretty impractical to make anything at scale.

  • source
  • parent