you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 14 hours ago* (1 child)

What’s wrong with the modern defintion?

You’re refusing to even believe there’s another one, if you perpetuate the antiquated one, and incorrectly try and correct someone who is trying to use it right, you’re only making things worse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

    Again, the idea of developing nations being in a "third" world isn't good. Putting down people from being a "third world" country isn't good. I am not advocating for this term, it is a stupid term that international organisations no longer use.

    And yes, alternatives exist. Developed/developing is better, though not perfect, and there are other, more accurate metrics and classifications on the development of nations

  • source
  • parent