Enshittification

hideshow 10 child comments

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Idk. Just looks like a template was used.

Most web software comes with templates.

parent

[–] XLE@piefed.social 1 point 19 hours ago (1 child)

Your red flags are correct. This website is made by an AI-using, AI-loving, Palantir employee.

Unfortunate so many people will actually read (or pretend to read) this post and say "yeah I loved ingesting that content actually", but welcome to Lemmy where all you need is a snappy title and a couple bullet points separated by commas!

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] JerryMerweather@piefed.social 2 points 16 hours ago*

You are exaggerating a bit too much. Sure, sometimes AI can write good stuff, my 2 problems with it are ethics and slop.

it is unethical, trained from stolen data, and sloppy(stupid), needs human editing/intervention.

This website seems like slop.

Unfortunate so many people will actually read (or pretend to read) this post and say “yeah I loved ingesting that content actually”, but welcome to Lemmy where all you need is a snappy title and a couple bullet points separated by commas!

I do that sometimes, but I dont claim to read the article then. Bullet points help me know what I should expect from the article, to deduce how interesting it is, and if its worth my time or not.

parent

[–] XLE@piefed.social -1 points 1 day ago (6 children)

The website content is overlong, tedious, and sure looks AI-generated.

The website content fails AI generation tests...

hideshow 6 child comments

parent

[–] LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com 0 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The website content is overlong, tedious, and sure looks AI-generated.

The website content is thoroughly researched and well documented from public information and corporate filings.

The website content fails AI generation tests...

Mary Shelley failed an AI generation test too.

hideshow 5 child comments

parent

[–] XLE@piefed.social 0 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

If you could be convinced that the website is filled with paragraphs of needless AI-generated text, how would you be convinced?

If the answer is "nothing" then I guess it'd be impossible to convince you anything online is AI, and that's worthless for discourse...

hideshow 4 child comments

parent

[–] LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com 1 point 15 hours ago (3 children)

Nothing from you will convince me of anything.

I don’t generally listen to people who make a determination and then work backwards to try and prove it. Or people who dismiss the content of things for some arbitrary reason like “they used AI tools, hurr durr, AI bad”.

Maybe you could be less lazy and link to the ongoing discussion (since you want discourse) in Hacker News, or better yet go participate there yourself.

Or you could point out that Keyana Sapp works in an AI field at Palantir instead of outright dismissing the content which is both accurate and directly relevant to a Lemmy community called enshittification.

hideshow 3 child comments

parent

[–] XLE@piefed.social 1 point 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

If nothing can convince you of the truth, then that's pathetic. I'm sorry you're so unreasonable

It's even worse that you knowingly would come out swinging in defense of AI slop written by a Palantir thug, out of apparently nothing more than a bruised ego. Surely the person who pasted that text can be held responsible for making a worse site on purpose.

hideshow 2 child comments

parent

[–] LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com 1 point 9 hours ago (1 child)

I am shocked, shocked I tell you, to see that you resorted to an ad hominem.

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] XLE@piefed.social 1 point 4 hours ago

An ad hominem like refusing to hear the truth because someone that offended you says it? Again, that is a deficiency you need to work through.

I mentioned Palantir hours before you did, so I'm curious to see if you'll continue shilling the AI fan just because of this bizarre oppositional behavior