you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The website content is overlong, tedious, and sure looks AI-generated.

The website content is thoroughly researched and well documented from public information and corporate filings.

The website content fails AI generation tests...

Mary Shelley failed an AI generation test too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    If you could be convinced that the website is filled with paragraphs of needless AI-generated text, how would you be convinced?

    If the answer is "nothing" then I guess it'd be impossible to convince you anything online is AI, and that's worthless for discourse...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 20 hours ago (3 children)

    Nothing from you will convince me of anything.

    I don’t generally listen to people who make a determination and then work backwards to try and prove it. Or people who dismiss the content of things for some arbitrary reason like “they used AI tools, hurr durr, AI bad”.

    Maybe you could be less lazy and link to the ongoing discussion (since you want discourse) in Hacker News, or better yet go participate there yourself.

    Or you could point out that Keyana Sapp works in an AI field at Palantir instead of outright dismissing the content which is both accurate and directly relevant to a Lemmy community called enshittification.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

    If nothing can convince you of the truth, then that's pathetic. I'm sorry you're so unreasonable

    It's even worse that you knowingly would come out swinging in defense of AI slop written by a Palantir thug, out of apparently nothing more than a bruised ego. Surely the person who pasted that text can be held responsible for making a worse site on purpose.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 15 hours ago (1 child)

    I am shocked, shocked I tell you, to see that you resorted to an ad hominem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 hours ago

    An ad hominem like refusing to hear the truth because someone that offended you says it? Again, that is a deficiency you need to work through.

    I mentioned Palantir hours before you did, so I'm curious to see if you'll continue shilling the AI fan just because of this bizarre oppositional behavior

  • source
  • parent