282
Girls Finally Safe Now That They Have to Show Adult Their Vagina to Play School Sports (theneedling.com)
submitted 17 hours ago by to c/seattle@lemmy.world
35 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Residents across the state of Washington breathed a sigh of relief this week after the passage of Initiative 638 guaranteed girls are finally safe now that they’re required to show an adult their vagina in order to play school sports.

“Thanks to I-638, all my 12-year-old daughter has to do now to be spared the trauma of losing 5th place to a trans girl in track is show her vagina to an adult,” said local father Hank Hanson. “I love that under this new law, not even a birth certificate is enough for a girl to prove her gender because that deprives children of the opportunity to proudly show their reproductive organs to an adult while I stand in the room and watch to add that extra feeling of comfort and safety.”

Girls who play sports from middle school on up thanked the 1.5 million adults who went so out of their way to make minors living in a country run by a pedophile feel that much more seen.

“Nothing makes me feel safer and more excited to play sports quite like being forced to spread my legs for an adult who’s in at least their 30s,” said 13-year-old soccer player Brittney Rigby. “I don’t know why anyone thought passage of this law might deter girls from playing sports at all. What kind of 7th grader isn’t excited to let an adult they don’t know get a good look at her privates? Pretty routine middle school physical stuff, I’ve heard.”

At press time, boys who play school sports were still sadly completely unsafe due to not being forced to show an adult their penises.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 6 hours ago (3 children)

  1. Sure, but surely it does both, if they had even thought of making it a requirement back then, so surely it would do both now.

  2. TIL, been a long time since I was a kid. Cool I guess, so at what age are kids required to drop trou at the doctor these days, never unless there's a specific issue? Can they conceivably get all the way to ogbyn-age (idk what that would be) or 45 for a prostate exam?

  3. Surely it doesn't "require" that, there has to be another way. (I'm assuming you mean they require it here, but I mean there's gotta be another way in existence).

Not that they should, I'm just surprised to learn they don't already do it (even if for other reasons) anymore.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 2 points 6 hours ago (1 child)
    1. Sports physicals have never had determining sex as a goal. Hernia checks are not sex checks.
    2. Having male presenting genitalia is not a 100% accurate way of determining sex.
    3. Expensive DNA tests
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] -1 points 5 hours ago

    1. Re-read that, because evidentially you mistook it.

    2. What does that have to do with getting naked at the doctor for regular tests? I'm wondering what the current age for that is, since you seem to be aware, and I'm only aware of my childhood era's practices.

    3. Well digital ovary manipulation and expensive tests doesn't seem like an exhaustive list, but to be fair everything at the doctor is expensive, depending on country.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 4 hours ago

    Regarding #2, the age to start seeing a gynecologist is after the first menstruation cycle or after first sexual activity or if there are worrying symptoms. So this can start as early as ten or eleven but is more commonly about fourteen or fifteen.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent