Microblog post: Not even a vegan but they’re obviously right no need to try to argue with them it’s fine to just be wrong and live your life
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 5 days ago (20 children)

the meat industry does in fact affect climate

true for any industry. look for how badly we have fucked up our soil

whatever you choose not to eat has absolutely no effect on anyone

it does. what I choose to not eat I need to compensate, so there is no choice of not eating something, only real choice is what to eat

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 days ago (5 children)

    Consider the amount of corn and soy grown for livestock.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 days ago (4 children)

    consider the amount of whatever we will have to grow to substitute meat

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 days ago (3 children)

    That would be much less than what we grow for that meat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    Possibly. Does it sound like "yeah, the problem of humans pushing other life forms into starvation and extinction is solved with this one simple trick"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 days ago (13 children)

    You forget to consider amounts. Some industries and foods have more effect than others, and the less you eat, the less of an effect you have.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 5 days ago (12 children)

    *the less humans are on the planet, the lesser footprint we leave. It should be handled this way but alas, we are not even close

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (11 children)

    The reason we take care of a fish tank, is to maintain the fish.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago (10 children)

    We did not setup the planet to plant humans here now, did we?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 days ago (9 children)
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago (8 children)

    Exactly. So what are you trying to say with that fishtank?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago (7 children)

    It allowed us to be here so don't mess with it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 days ago (6 children)

    Exactly. Like I said, the fewer of us, the lesser our strain on everything around

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (5 children)

    If your goal is to reduce "strain on everything around" (whatever that means), it looks like either a: you starve people, or b: we reduce our fossil fuel consumption. I'd choose b.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 days ago (4 children)

    B is not a solution. Nor A is needed. Come on, it's not rocket surgery

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago* (3 children)

    Then I have no idea what problem you're talking about and what you want from me.

    Sounds like you want to make money off fossil fuels and you want me to tell you that's fine, but I'm no rocket surgeon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

    From you - nothing, I am merely responding to you. The problem is two-fold: one, we are still taking care of our survival at the expense of all other life forms: agriculture that destroys soil, manufacturing that is poisoning water, soil and air, etc. etc. All this can be done in a much more effective and sustainable way. Two, whichever way we do it, planet is finite, so ever increasing human population is a disaster in making. It is time we realized that and started managing our numbers in such a way we don't starve other life just by existing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments