you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 4 days ago (5 children)

even if they're confused about what monopolies are.

So if you just said obscenely large market value that doesn't diminish or minimize the risk, and neatly avoids the confusion about what monopolies are.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 days ago* (4 children)

    We could dance around the word itself, and just describe an elephant, but that only delays when people with misconceptions hear the word for this animal and go ‘nuh-uh.’

    That delay would be worse - because it allows for people who acknowledge all the reasons Steam is a monopoly, and all the reasons that monopoly is a systemic risk, but will still insist with kneejerk certainty that Steam doesn’t count. It’s some other distinct thing, despite the absence of difference.

    Pretending there's a difference doesn't avoid the confusion... it is the confusion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 days ago (3 children)

    If there's no difference in meaning then it doesn't matter which you use. If there's a difference in understanding it makes more sense to choose the clearer option.

    As I said before: we're not going to find a middle ground between you claiming your distinction is meaningful, and me saying it's meaningless. One we remove that from the conversation there's nothing left because you haven't really said anything else.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    Are you sure? Will you finally stop saying that the label implies a call to action, next time someone uses it? Even if that someone is me, yet again?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 days ago (1 child)

    Yes, I fully agree you've said nothing at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 days ago

    You think that's an insult when it's a breakthrough. Assuming it's true this time. You've already lied about it repeatedly, before circling right back to the same irrelevant assertions. If you finally understand the simple reality of the situation and have a low opinion of how plain it is, that beats the hell out of actively refusing to get it or shut up about it.

  • source
  • parent