Many of the articles are in Swedish, so are subject to translation errors , but: It seems to mostly center around one of the co-CEO's personal donations to recent populist party that has hardline views regarding immigration. The other co-CEO spoke out against the donation but as it wasn't tied to the company there's likely not much more to be done there.
Absent a particular stance on such from Örebropartiet, I don't see how this is impactful to the nature of privacy under VPN's, and IMO is different from a CEO or founder fawning over a government that's actively creating a surveillance-state.