▲ 199 ▼ Just received an email from feddit.online saying they've geoblocked UK IPs due to the Online Safety Act (piefed.social) submitted 1 year ago by Skavau@piefed.social to c/fediverse@lemmy.world 29 comments fedilink hide all child comments I think they're the 3rd, 4th largest piefed instance? Check: !feddit_online@feddit.online
[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 year ago (3 children) 6th with 70 monthly active users https://piefed.fediverse.observer/list Piefed.social has 949, piefed.world 222 permalink fedilink source hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Jerry@feddit.online 11 points 1 year ago (2 children) Piefed.social isn't as affected because they restrict the NSFW communities. Feddit.online doesn't have the restriction, so it's more exposed. The fear is a complaint being made to Digital Ocean that a server they host is violating UK law. It would be much easier for DO to remove the server than to take any other action. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago That makes sense permalink fedilink source parent [–] Skavau@piefed.social [S] 9 points 1 year ago To be clear, the specifics in the act go beyond not specifically hosting pornographic content. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Jerry@feddit.online 11 points 1 year ago (2 children) Piefed.social isn't as affected because they restrict the NSFW communities. Feddit.online doesn't have the restriction, so it's more exposed. The fear is a complaint being made to Digital Ocean that a server they host is violating UK law. It would be much easier for DO to remove the server than to take any other action. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago That makes sense permalink fedilink source parent [–] Skavau@piefed.social [S] 9 points 1 year ago To be clear, the specifics in the act go beyond not specifically hosting pornographic content. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Skavau@piefed.social [S] 9 points 1 year ago To be clear, the specifics in the act go beyond not specifically hosting pornographic content. permalink fedilink source parent