politics

hideshow 13 child comments

parent

[–] Hobthrob@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (12 children)

Yep. Feel free to criticize the actual approach the person took or try to disprove it though. I don't really care where things come from, if the method is good.

hideshow 12 child comments

parent

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Also all this time spent replying to me when you could have been sourcing your claims.

You're not a serious person.

hideshow 7 child comments

parent

[–] Hobthrob@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (6 children)

So you claim.

hideshow 6 child comments

parent

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Bring real sources and maybe we can talk.

hideshow 5 child comments

parent

[–] Hobthrob@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (4 children)

If you want a different standard than what it's currently set you can lead by example, rather than with ad hominems.

hideshow 4 child comments

parent

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I do. I bring sources all the time.

It’s not my responsibility to make sure you’re using critical thinking.

hideshow 3 child comments

parent

[–] Hobthrob@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If you bring sources all the time, why won't you adhere to your own regular standard now?

Why do I have to follow an example you won't set for me?

hideshow 2 child comments

parent

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 child)

You Destiny fans are incredibly predictable lol

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] Hobthrob@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Hitchen's Razor.

parent

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago* (3 children)

That's a fucking blog with no sources either. It's an opinion piece with no meat, no substance, nothing.

Medium is not considered a good source in any space with serious adults talking about real issues.

This "article" is as useless as your AI block of text about Hasan with 0 sources.

hideshow 3 child comments

parent

[–] Hobthrob@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There's literal pictures take from Hasan's own stream, and e-mail conversation with a company representive that recognizes the product. I chased down the image and found it to be verifiable. While I cannot very a private email I could verify the company and the product and match it to the image.

I don't care where the evidence is, I care that it is verifiable in so far as it can be, and I could verify the majority of that blog post, which is more than you've been able to give me.

Again, no AI used in any of my work, but feel free to keep riding that ad hominem as far as it'll take you.

hideshow 2 child comments

parent

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 child)

I gave you a literal clip of Dan Saltman admitting that he saw how people reacted to Ethan Klein killing his dog with cheese and that's how he came up with the idea of spreading the shock collar rumor.

Straight from the horse's mouth.

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] Hobthrob@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Whether he did or did not spread a rumour is entirely irrelevant, because nothing I presented relied on any rumours from anywhere. The evidence was taken from Hasan Piker's videos and I could verify that.

So that is irrelevant.