▲ 892 ▼ Man granted first-of-its-kind religious exemption against mandatory AI use at work (www.tomshardware.com) submitted 1 week ago by yesman@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 157 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] Doomsider@lemmy.world -8 points 1 week ago (13 children) Are you trying to get religious exemptions taken away? permalink fedilink source hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] boatswain@infosec.pub 20 points 1 week ago (7 children) Rights that can't be used for fear of having them stripped are not rights. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [+] Doomsider@lemmy.world -7 points 1 week ago (6 children) That seems correct. I would personally have to see the holy book that talks about how AI is wrong before I could buy into this supposed right. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] RumRunningDevil@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago (5 children) The guys a humanist. I can hear your trilby hat flapping in the wind from all the way over here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Doomsider@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago* (4 children) Humanism is not a religion. Talk about stretching a law to its breaking point. I can see your gears not quite meshing from way over here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] RumRunningDevil@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago* (3 children) Yes it is. https://thehumanist.com/commentary/humanism-is-a-religion-why-even-anti-religion-humanists-should-celebrate/ Also, even if it wasn't it wouldn't matter, legally speaking. The EEOC guarantees protections whether or not an organization has tax exempt status. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_exemption permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Doomsider@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago (2 children) I don't agree with this Federal court decision and nor does many other humanists like me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RumRunningDevil@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (1 child) HAHAHAHAHAHA Alright, so I can wrap my head around this. Your response to being told that no one is "stretching the law" because the law specifically protects this kind of speech is to say "nu uh?" You're claiming a religious exemption from the law that enables you to claim a religious exemption? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Doomsider@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago You are clearly confused, cheers! permalink fedilink source parent [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 12 points 1 week ago (3 children) Being exempted for belonging to a special club is ass. Being exempted because personal moral conviction despite not belonging to a special club: cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 child) I prefer vague made up religious exemptions over a reasonable moral conviction /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago Only one of these is protected by law. permalink fedilink source parent [–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 week ago Being exempted for belonging to a special club is ass completely normal. Being exempted because personal moral conviction despite not belonging to a special club: cool prohibited by law. permalink fedilink source parent [–] EatMyPixelDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago Honestly, that'd be great. Let's not give people stupid exemptions for delusional beliefs. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] boatswain@infosec.pub 20 points 1 week ago (7 children) Rights that can't be used for fear of having them stripped are not rights. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [+] Doomsider@lemmy.world -7 points 1 week ago (6 children) That seems correct. I would personally have to see the holy book that talks about how AI is wrong before I could buy into this supposed right. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] RumRunningDevil@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago (5 children) The guys a humanist. I can hear your trilby hat flapping in the wind from all the way over here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Doomsider@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago* (4 children) Humanism is not a religion. Talk about stretching a law to its breaking point. I can see your gears not quite meshing from way over here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] RumRunningDevil@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago* (3 children) Yes it is. https://thehumanist.com/commentary/humanism-is-a-religion-why-even-anti-religion-humanists-should-celebrate/ Also, even if it wasn't it wouldn't matter, legally speaking. The EEOC guarantees protections whether or not an organization has tax exempt status. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_exemption permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Doomsider@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago (2 children) I don't agree with this Federal court decision and nor does many other humanists like me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RumRunningDevil@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (1 child) HAHAHAHAHAHA Alright, so I can wrap my head around this. Your response to being told that no one is "stretching the law" because the law specifically protects this kind of speech is to say "nu uh?" You're claiming a religious exemption from the law that enables you to claim a religious exemption? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Doomsider@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago You are clearly confused, cheers! permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Doomsider@lemmy.world -7 points 1 week ago (6 children) That seems correct. I would personally have to see the holy book that talks about how AI is wrong before I could buy into this supposed right. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] RumRunningDevil@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago (5 children) The guys a humanist. I can hear your trilby hat flapping in the wind from all the way over here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Doomsider@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago* (4 children) Humanism is not a religion. Talk about stretching a law to its breaking point. I can see your gears not quite meshing from way over here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] RumRunningDevil@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago* (3 children) Yes it is. https://thehumanist.com/commentary/humanism-is-a-religion-why-even-anti-religion-humanists-should-celebrate/ Also, even if it wasn't it wouldn't matter, legally speaking. The EEOC guarantees protections whether or not an organization has tax exempt status. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_exemption permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Doomsider@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago (2 children) I don't agree with this Federal court decision and nor does many other humanists like me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RumRunningDevil@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (1 child) HAHAHAHAHAHA Alright, so I can wrap my head around this. Your response to being told that no one is "stretching the law" because the law specifically protects this kind of speech is to say "nu uh?" You're claiming a religious exemption from the law that enables you to claim a religious exemption? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Doomsider@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago You are clearly confused, cheers! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RumRunningDevil@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago (5 children) The guys a humanist. I can hear your trilby hat flapping in the wind from all the way over here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Doomsider@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago* (4 children) Humanism is not a religion. Talk about stretching a law to its breaking point. I can see your gears not quite meshing from way over here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] RumRunningDevil@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago* (3 children) Yes it is. https://thehumanist.com/commentary/humanism-is-a-religion-why-even-anti-religion-humanists-should-celebrate/ Also, even if it wasn't it wouldn't matter, legally speaking. The EEOC guarantees protections whether or not an organization has tax exempt status. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_exemption permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Doomsider@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago (2 children) I don't agree with this Federal court decision and nor does many other humanists like me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RumRunningDevil@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (1 child) HAHAHAHAHAHA Alright, so I can wrap my head around this. Your response to being told that no one is "stretching the law" because the law specifically protects this kind of speech is to say "nu uh?" You're claiming a religious exemption from the law that enables you to claim a religious exemption? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Doomsider@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago You are clearly confused, cheers! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago* (4 children) Humanism is not a religion. Talk about stretching a law to its breaking point. I can see your gears not quite meshing from way over here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] RumRunningDevil@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago* (3 children) Yes it is. https://thehumanist.com/commentary/humanism-is-a-religion-why-even-anti-religion-humanists-should-celebrate/ Also, even if it wasn't it wouldn't matter, legally speaking. The EEOC guarantees protections whether or not an organization has tax exempt status. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_exemption permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Doomsider@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago (2 children) I don't agree with this Federal court decision and nor does many other humanists like me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RumRunningDevil@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (1 child) HAHAHAHAHAHA Alright, so I can wrap my head around this. Your response to being told that no one is "stretching the law" because the law specifically protects this kind of speech is to say "nu uh?" You're claiming a religious exemption from the law that enables you to claim a religious exemption? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Doomsider@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago You are clearly confused, cheers! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RumRunningDevil@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago* (3 children) Yes it is. https://thehumanist.com/commentary/humanism-is-a-religion-why-even-anti-religion-humanists-should-celebrate/ Also, even if it wasn't it wouldn't matter, legally speaking. The EEOC guarantees protections whether or not an organization has tax exempt status. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_exemption permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Doomsider@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago (2 children) I don't agree with this Federal court decision and nor does many other humanists like me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RumRunningDevil@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (1 child) HAHAHAHAHAHA Alright, so I can wrap my head around this. Your response to being told that no one is "stretching the law" because the law specifically protects this kind of speech is to say "nu uh?" You're claiming a religious exemption from the law that enables you to claim a religious exemption? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Doomsider@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago You are clearly confused, cheers! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago (2 children) I don't agree with this Federal court decision and nor does many other humanists like me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RumRunningDevil@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (1 child) HAHAHAHAHAHA Alright, so I can wrap my head around this. Your response to being told that no one is "stretching the law" because the law specifically protects this kind of speech is to say "nu uh?" You're claiming a religious exemption from the law that enables you to claim a religious exemption? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Doomsider@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago You are clearly confused, cheers! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RumRunningDevil@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (1 child) HAHAHAHAHAHA Alright, so I can wrap my head around this. Your response to being told that no one is "stretching the law" because the law specifically protects this kind of speech is to say "nu uh?" You're claiming a religious exemption from the law that enables you to claim a religious exemption? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Doomsider@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago You are clearly confused, cheers! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago You are clearly confused, cheers! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 12 points 1 week ago (3 children) Being exempted for belonging to a special club is ass. Being exempted because personal moral conviction despite not belonging to a special club: cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 child) I prefer vague made up religious exemptions over a reasonable moral conviction /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago Only one of these is protected by law. permalink fedilink source parent [–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 week ago Being exempted for belonging to a special club is ass completely normal. Being exempted because personal moral conviction despite not belonging to a special club: cool prohibited by law. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 child) I prefer vague made up religious exemptions over a reasonable moral conviction /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago Only one of these is protected by law. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago Only one of these is protected by law. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 week ago Being exempted for belonging to a special club is ass completely normal. Being exempted because personal moral conviction despite not belonging to a special club: cool prohibited by law. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] EatMyPixelDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago Honestly, that'd be great. Let's not give people stupid exemptions for delusional beliefs. permalink fedilink source parent