Steam doesn't do anything to stop devs explaining how and what they used in the disclosure. If it's "content-aware fill was used in the creation of skyboxes", they can say that

But also, I think that the issue could be solved well enough by Steam just listing what counts. If it's a grey area and a line is to be drawn somewhere, so be it. Something like CAF potentially falling on the wrong side of it is nowhere near enough of a cost to justify just not informing buyers in my opinion

Anti-AI prejudices are completely rational. These models were trained on stolen art, code, and writing. They use an incredible amount of energy and are the sole driver for the construction of dozens of new datacenters of unprecedented size and resources.

The AI industry has completely taken over allocation for chip manufacturing, making prices for most consumer electronics soar out of reach for most of the people (including the ones trying to play these games in the first place).

All the while the circular investing scheme of the industry has created a $3 trillion dollar bubble, which at best, will cause the stock market to fall hard and take a huge chunk out of a lot of retirement accounts overnight. At worst, combined with wars and other strains on the economy, will cause a full-blown recession.

It’s also being heavily used by law enforcement to track people illegally without due process. And by the military for who knows what yet.

This shit is just the basics. The AI industry has been toxic to our society, and on top of that, for all the harm it’s causing, the stuff it outputs is middling at best. Most of it is derivative garbage.

So yeah, people should be ashamed for using it. If you can’t make it without AI, don’t bother. No one wants to see it.

Lastly, lying by omission is still lying. Come on, now.