you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 week ago (2 children)

Except that it is, and you are patently wrong.

Which life has more value? Hitler, or your child's? If given the choice, would you have killed Hitler to stop what he did?

Would you kill a child rapist to stop them from raping a child? What if it was the only way to stop them?

You're stuck. If you say you Hitler has the same value, you wouldn't have killed him, you wouldn't kill the child rapist, etc., then you're either deluded, trolling, stupid, or evil, but if you agree you would then you're admitting that human value is not only subjective, but that you yourself personally and wholly understand that all human life has not only subjective value and relative value, but also kills your statement entirely.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (1 child)

    Neither

    I wouldn't have killed him, more like non-lethal options

    Killing them is NEVER the only way to stop them

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 week ago

    But what if it is? What if they look you in the eye and tell you that unless you kill them, they will go do it again and again and again? What if people tried to stop him and he killed them and did it again? How much of a risk do we take until someone simply puts him down? Your use of absolutes makes you look incredibly naive.

  • source
  • parent