177
Democratic candidate for the senate, Josh Turek, releases an anti-trans campaign ad referring to trans women as "males competing in females' sports." (video.twimg.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago by to c/progressivepolitics@lemmy.world
189 comments fedilink hide all child comments
🎻 1
 

This got removed from politics because "Video links are not allowed" apparently? Pretty weird considering that most politicians say stuff on video nowadays and not really writing articles anymore since the invention of the radio pretty much lol. Hope it's a better fit here, this is the kind of stuff people should be aware of.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/73859928

cross-posted from: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/13118934

Josh Turek of Iowa, Democrat, comes out with one of the worst anti-trans ads yet.

Not only is it an anti-sports ad, it proposes a ban on federal funding for gender affirming care. That would hit all medicaid and medicare patients, and any ACA federally-subsidized plans as well.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -7 points 2 weeks ago (47 children)

You forgot Republicans is anti a lot more, and when they get more votes and win, more people suffer and the message to dems is they aren't doing enough shitty things.

Are you okay with the republican cuts to Medicare, ACA, aid support around the world which has resulted in hundreds of thousands of kid deaths?

Because by not voting against them, you are showing you don't care enough to stop them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 47 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago

    Nah, fuck that bullshit. I'm trans. If you don't care enough about the lives of and my people to vote against transphobes, I don't really care what happens to the rest of the country at that point. If the entire society wants to go bigot, well then you all can go straight to hell. Let democracy fall. You clearly don't deserve it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 2 weeks ago (45 children)

    So what I'm hearing is that you're ok with trans genocide. Human rights are non-negotiable.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 45 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 1 week ago (5 children)

    So what I’m hearing is that you have no solution to the reality of the choices here. It’s either D, R, 3rd party, or not voting. Play out each of those voting scenarios for me. How does it impact the national layout of Congress?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    What I'm hearing is that you find the genocide of trans people an acceptable compromise between the 2 major parties. You would rather vote for a Democrat that wants to federally ban trans healthcare than push back against the Democrats even a little.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

    I don’t live in Iowa, so I don’t know what the other primary candidates were like. Does it suck that this is the winner of the Democrat party? Absolutely, but apparently that’s what a majority of Democrats in Iowa wanted.

    No fucking clue, but what the reality of the situation is that either a D or R are going to win this race.

    What is your solution to this scenario? Let Hinson win so that there can be even more harm?

    The more seats the Republicans win/hold in Congress, the worse off the entire country will be.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    You don't have to live in Iowa for me to understand this, because you've already made it pretty clear what side you'd be on if it were a decision you need to make. And it's not on the side of trans people.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Interesting that there are several people that simply REFUSE to answer what they would do in this scenario.

    Given the choice of Turek or Hinson, what would you do?

    Don’t give me philosophical what-if scenarios. This is the reality of the ballot box in Iowa.

    Turek or Hinson?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago

    I already told you what I would do, you just don't want to listen. I would go to the polling place and vote, while not voting on this seat. This would be a part of a coordinated campaign that also uplifts the voices of trans people during and after, to make it impossible for the dnc to ignore.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -4 points 1 week ago (16 children)

    Funny claiming the rights are non negotiable yet you are giving up far more by allowing a republican to win instead.

    You might be able to change his mind about trans rights.

    You 100% will not change the republicans and they want even more people to lose their rights and care even less about their lives.

    I'm loving in the real world where voting has major consequences and trying to deal with reducing the amount of hatred and saving lives. Not voting against republicans will cost countless more lives to be lost.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago* (15 children)

    The Democrat wants the same thing as the Republican. There is no changing either of their minds. I am one of their targets. Don't fucking talk down to me like I don't know what I'm talking about.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
    •
  • [–] -4 points 1 week ago (14 children)

    Really so they are exactly the same? Minus all the much worse stuff that the republicans also want.

    But that doesn't matter to you?

    What is your solution?

    One of them will win and you don't care if its the worse one who will hurt more?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (13 children)

    Where did I say that they were exactly the same? Why are you being disingenuous?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
    •
  • [–] -3 points 1 week ago (12 children)

    Your previous message said they want the same things.

    What are you going to do to prevent the republican from winning?

    What about all the people they will hurt with their policies?

    Do you think your life will honestly be better with them in power?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago (11 children)

    Yea, they both want to strip my human rights away. I didn't say that they were exactly the same. Different words mean different things.

    My life will get demonstrably worse with either candidate, being trans+ myself. We are not your volleyball in the game of politics, we are people.

    I'm organizing unions, to build labor power in support of a general strike that CWA, UAW, and other unions are building towards.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 1 week ago (10 children)

    Okay so you agree that it would be worse if the republican wins?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (9 children)

    When the "good guys" are talking about taking away human rights, there is no better or worse. Only depths of depravity.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 1 week ago (8 children)

    Really neither could be worse? How very black and white your world vote is. Ignorance is bliss

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 3 points 1 week ago* (6 children)

    What bliss you cretin? There is a trans genocide looming and you're ready to throw trans people under the bus to save your sorry ass πŸ¦¨πŸ’¨

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 1 week ago (5 children)

    Ah yes letting Republicans win will surely avoid Trans hate!

    If you think letting them win office won't hurt Trans and others you are delusional

    Yes the dem here is an ignorant asshole and this ad is terrible, but he's still better than his opponent and their views of Trans and others lives.

    If you honestly think a Trans genocide is looming, you should do everything you can to not let a republican win and prevent it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 3 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    You people are so ignorant and short-sighted while lecturing everyone else and calling them ignorant, it's honestly baffling.

    What do you think other dem campaigns will look like if the transphobe manages to end an 18 year losing streak? Why do you think giving yards and miles to the fascists is acceptable in any form?? How do you hope to accomplish anything if you keep bowing your head and licking dem boot?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    Having watched it happen over and over already when the right sounds it moves farther right each year. When the left winds out moves left.

    We have racists and nazis now because they keep winning because there is no perfect dem and people vote 3rd party or don't vote "to send a message". It doesn't fucking work.

    Stop the bleeding.

    A shitty dem is still better than a even more hateful republican. Start the process of moving the state left and reach year vote in more progressive people.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    We have racists and nazis now because they keep winning because there is no perfect dem and people vote 3rd party or don’t vote β€œto send a message”. It doesn’t fucking work.

    People aren't looking for a perfect dem, people are looking for a non-genocidal one. They were willing to support the palestinian genocide while preaching trans rights, now they are supporting the trans genocide while preaching something else, why does anyone still believe them??

    Stop the bleeding.

    That's up to the dems!!

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Fact is you have two real choices because of how elections work

    Fact is if you don't push for the lesser, even going as far as to push people to not vote for them, you are actively pushing for the worse person to win

    Fact is the more dems that win, the more power the whole party gets. That means more progressives have real power to change and can sway the more right members of the party.

    Fact is anyone pushing "they are the same" and not voting are responsible for the bad caused by the right winning more and more and helping to push their Nazi agenda.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 week ago*

    Fact is people that are willing to throw minorities under the bus to appeal to fascists are not progressive.

    Fact is that if they win, other states will take note and copy.

    Fact is that if you vote for lesser fascism you are still voting for fascism.

    Fact is you have no plan, no clue and don't want to do anything hard so you just keep voting blue hoping things will turn around someday somehow.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -4 points 1 week ago (21 children)

    Explain how your non vote is going to save their lives? You are okay with it and more by not voting and getting someone even worse in office.

    At least voting them in maybe their fellow dems can change their mind. Getting 4 more years of a republican means 4 more years of anti rights and deaths.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago (20 children)

    My choices would be between "the person that wants to kill me", and "the person that wants to kill me". I'm a target of their genocide.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Also where does this person want to kill you? Amazing how you made that up so you don't have to face that not voting for them will lead to deaths by your inaction

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Trans healthcare is lifesaving. It's really fucking telling that you either don't know that or choose to ignore it so you can come in on your high horse and tell the trans people that they're overreacting because a Democrat wants to ban trans healthcare.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] -2 points 1 week ago

    Fact is you have two real choices because of how elections work

    Fact is if you don't push for the lesser, even going as far as to push people to not vote for them, you are actively pushing for the worse person to win

    Fact is the more dems that win, the more power the whole party gets. That means more progressives have real power to change and can sway the more right members of the party.

    Fact is anyone pushing "they are the same" and not voting are responsible for the bad caused by the right winning more and more and helping to push their Nazi agenda.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -4 points 1 week ago (16 children)

    In your words one who wants to kill you, and one who wants to kill you and many others and you would rather the second win so you can feel smug about it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago (15 children)

    Where is the line? At what point are you unwilling to support a candidate over their anti-trans stance? Banning trans healthcare should be enough.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
    •
  • [–] -3 points 1 week ago (14 children)

    What are you going to do? How are you standing up for all of those that they are going to hurt over 4 years?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago (13 children)

    That doesn't answer the question. At what point is a Democrat's anti-trans stance unacceptable to you?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
    •
  • [–] -3 points 1 week ago (12 children)

    It is. But they are both anti Trans and the republicans anti even more.

    One of them will take over for 4 years.

    Which of those would you rather have power?

    Do you not think the dem can have their mind changed?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (11 children)

    Both are unacceptable. Voting for either will indicate to the dnc to move right. The only way forward is to show Democrats that people will not vote for anti-trans stances.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] -3 points 1 week ago (10 children)

    I've watched this play out for decades.

    Not voting because they aren't left enough and the right wins, means they move farther right. I've seen it constantly. Please explain how this time its different?

    You are okay with the republican winning? You arent voting to stop it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    You aren't fucking listening. I didn't say don't vote at all. I said don't vote for this seat. This isn't a god damn purity test, this is a candidate openly saying that I shouldn't have rights.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (7 children)

    You really expect Trans people to vote for someone who advocates their death? I mean really?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 1 week ago (5 children)

    Also please show where he advocates for your death

    The republican might but he isn't.

    Ffs the ad is garbage but you are making up so much bullshit to help republicans

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (4 children)

    I'm so sick and tired of you people pretending not to understand the consequences of these actions. Trans people will die from the policies he's endorsing here. That is inescapable. Now that's okay for you cuz for you trans people are a token that needs to be spent.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    No I'm sick of peeps like you pretending there is a 3rd option or that his opponent isn't worse.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Worse for you maybe. But why should trans people care? You are okay with them dead. What do they owe you?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •