you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Those are private (or whatever goes by private with the ccp) developments, which cut corners for profit. Same happens in Italy for instance, on a lower height.

Their public infrastructure (bridges, rail, hospitals) are not bad at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    China is contrary to a popular belief capitalist country, so yes they are private. I appreciate your feedback regarding public infrastructure and I will remember it when talking about chinese infrastructure again, however falling skyscrapers are still a serious issue which at this scale should have already been addressed by CCP especially by self proclaimed socialist government.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 week ago* (2 children)

    The largest entities in China are publicly owned. Even if you incorrectly state that China is capitalist, that doesn't suddenly mean that they don't have a public sector. That being said, China is socialist from a Marxist perspective because social ownership is the principal aspect of its economy, and the state is under the control of the working class.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    the state is under the control of the working class

    Bad joke buddy. Blocked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment