you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Because anarchy is not the question of reparative and rehabilitative justice, that's cop talk. Justice is a liberal proposition, if you want to do anarchy, you must think bigger not liberal+.

If you want to talk justice, constitution, law, etc you can join your local social democracy party. Just stop calling yourself anarchist, stop diluting words.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (6 children)

    Ok, I see my mistake: You can't read, and you don't comprehend “without hierarchy.”

    Later demagogue🖕

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

    "it's not a forest, it's a stationary non-animal life."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    “The forest was shrinking but the trees kept voting for the axe, for the axe was clever and convinced the trees that because his handle was made of wood he was one of them.” —Turkish Proverbs

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    You do realize that wanting anarchy but supporting secret police and prisons makes you the tree voting for the axe, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    I am not a Leninist. You observed that correctly! Now explain to !Anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com why revolutionaries should ignore their oppressors’ information gathering?

    Disengage me from it. I have gathered enough from you to be aware you don't know anything about revolutionary action.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments