President Donald Trump threatened to veto every piece of legislation put forward during the second half of his administration if Democrats flip control of the House or Senate during next month’s midterm elections.

“Well, I think the Republicans are going to win. But if there was, you call it gridlock, what happens is I veto everything,” Trump told reporters Friday morning while speaking on the South Lawn. “And then the Democrats come and they want to make a deal. So we’ll work it out.”

Historical precedent and polling data suggest Democrats are on the cusp of flipping at least the House next month and possibly the Senate, due to public frustration over the Iran war and high costs of living.

So, they will override his veto

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 66 points 1 week ago (16 children)

So, they will override his veto

I will be giddy if Dems win enough seats to have the 2/3 of both house and senate it takes to do so.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 66 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    If that happens and sticks (and he is removed from the presidency), come back to this comment and I will send you $1,000. No joke.

    I'm not worried. But I promise I will honour this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

    Dems would have to win all but two of the thirty-three 2026 Senate races to reach 67 votes (including independents). I wouldn't hold my breath.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 week ago (5 children)

    Assuming no Republicans cross the aisle. That's a fairly reasonable assumption today because the Republican party has been purged of anyone who would be willing to cross Trump.

    But I suspect that assumption might not remain so valid if we were to see the kind of blue tsunami it would take to get anywhere near 2/3 of the Senate. Even if you only had 64 seats instead of 67, that still means almost every state went blue, including most of the deep red ones. Any politician with basic survival instincts is going to recognize that tying themselves to the lame duck president that has practically destroyed their party is not going to be a good long term strategy.

    It's not much more plausible a scenario than one where Dems win a full supermajority, but if it were to happen, I would be shocked if every single Republican chose to go down with the ship.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

    54 seats is the current upper bound of projections for the Democrats in the Senate, let alone 67. Even the moderately Republican-favoring Senate races of South Carolina, Florida, and Nebraska additionally all going blue—currently unlikely—would only take it to 57.

    Perhaps enough to prevent a filibuster on contentious issues with enough bipartisan support, but not enough to overturn a veto in most cases.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    If they do that, don't they then also have enough power to impeach?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago

    The key part to impeachment is the vote to convict. That's where his prior impeachments failed. In my fantasy where they had 2/3 of both houses they could do it, sure, but my comment was kinda joking - I'm not sure there are enough seats up for election in this cycle for them to get to that point even if they won everything.

  • source
  • parent