▲ 787 ▼ Kagi now has a Fediverse Forums search toggle (media.piefed.social) submitted 2 weeks ago by jarmitage@piefed.social to c/fediverse@lemmy.world 153 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] TaterTot@piefed.social 11 points 2 weeks ago (6 children) The title's claim is false? Does Kagi not have a Fediverse Forms search toggle now? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children) It doesn't have it "now", it's had it for a while. Maybe a better word is "inaccurate"? Saying it's new is a lie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Sasquatch@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) It does have it now I just checked. It may have also had it then, but I can't confirm that. From your testimony, it seems like Kagi both has this toggle now, and had this toggle then permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 1 point 2 weeks ago Your reading comprehension skills are not that great, got it. Thanks for letting everyone know. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Steve@communick.news 1 point 2 weeks ago (2 children) No, they don't have it now. Though they may again by the time your read this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TaterTot@piefed.social 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child) Schrödinger's Feature!? O.o permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Steve@communick.news 2 points 2 weeks ago* In effect, yes. It's a joke; Made by your use of a different meaning of "now" than OP used in the title. I was pointing out that your use of "now" is an instantaneous moment, of which there are really countless numbers, between your typing the letters "n" and "w", if counted in Plank time. And with such a definition, it's impossible to know if the feature exists at any given "now", since we can't possibly agree on or even accurately choose one. So yes, Schrödinger's Feature now applies. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children) It doesn't have it "now", it's had it for a while. Maybe a better word is "inaccurate"? Saying it's new is a lie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Sasquatch@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) It does have it now I just checked. It may have also had it then, but I can't confirm that. From your testimony, it seems like Kagi both has this toggle now, and had this toggle then permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 1 point 2 weeks ago Your reading comprehension skills are not that great, got it. Thanks for letting everyone know. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sasquatch@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) It does have it now I just checked. It may have also had it then, but I can't confirm that. From your testimony, it seems like Kagi both has this toggle now, and had this toggle then permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 1 point 2 weeks ago Your reading comprehension skills are not that great, got it. Thanks for letting everyone know. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 1 point 2 weeks ago Your reading comprehension skills are not that great, got it. Thanks for letting everyone know. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Steve@communick.news 1 point 2 weeks ago (2 children) No, they don't have it now. Though they may again by the time your read this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TaterTot@piefed.social 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child) Schrödinger's Feature!? O.o permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Steve@communick.news 2 points 2 weeks ago* In effect, yes. It's a joke; Made by your use of a different meaning of "now" than OP used in the title. I was pointing out that your use of "now" is an instantaneous moment, of which there are really countless numbers, between your typing the letters "n" and "w", if counted in Plank time. And with such a definition, it's impossible to know if the feature exists at any given "now", since we can't possibly agree on or even accurately choose one. So yes, Schrödinger's Feature now applies. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TaterTot@piefed.social 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child) Schrödinger's Feature!? O.o permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Steve@communick.news 2 points 2 weeks ago* In effect, yes. It's a joke; Made by your use of a different meaning of "now" than OP used in the title. I was pointing out that your use of "now" is an instantaneous moment, of which there are really countless numbers, between your typing the letters "n" and "w", if counted in Plank time. And with such a definition, it's impossible to know if the feature exists at any given "now", since we can't possibly agree on or even accurately choose one. So yes, Schrödinger's Feature now applies. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Steve@communick.news 2 points 2 weeks ago* In effect, yes. It's a joke; Made by your use of a different meaning of "now" than OP used in the title. I was pointing out that your use of "now" is an instantaneous moment, of which there are really countless numbers, between your typing the letters "n" and "w", if counted in Plank time. And with such a definition, it's impossible to know if the feature exists at any given "now", since we can't possibly agree on or even accurately choose one. So yes, Schrödinger's Feature now applies. permalink fedilink source parent