you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (12 children)

It doesn't. Parts of the Bible do, but I do not believe that the Bible is the inherent word of God. Only fundamentalists believe that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

    How convenient for you that you get to pick and choose which parts you like.

    Even though your own lord and savior said that he didn't come to abolish the old law but to fulfill it, and that not a single bit of that old law will change until the end of the earth (paraphrasing Matthew 5:17).

    You don't get to pick and choose what that "old law" was, it's literally the entire first part of your holy book. And it explicitly condones slavery (among a litany of other heinous shit).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

    How convenient for you that you get to pick and choose which parts you like.

    It's not cherrypicking, it's interpretation. I do not arbitrarily choose, I study the context, and use the Love of God as an hermeneutical key, to cite Martin Luther.

    Even though your own lord and savior said that he didn’t come to abolish the old law but to fulfill it, and that not a single bit of that old law will change until the end of the earth (paraphrasing Matthew 5:17).

    I answered about this text here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

    I have no interest in your pathetic apologetics.

    I hope that one day you're able to escape the abusive relationship you've chosen to have with a non-existent entity. It's so very freeing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

    I feel free, thank you. I hope than one day, you'll learn that it makes more happy to actually think that there's more than one legitimate way to see the world.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

    I see the world in more ways than you could ever imagine, and that began as soon as I left behind the shackles of religion and stopped putting faith in things that have never been (literally cannot be) proved.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

    You refuse to put faith in things that cannot be proved? Sad if true. But it's probably not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (5 children)

    I like to believe in true things. Call me crazy.

    We have developed this thing called "the scientific method" that allows us to understand things without the need for "faith."

    And it's likely the reason that you didn't die as an infant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago* (4 children)

    Only provable things can be true?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    When we're talking about extraordinary claims, then they require extraordinary evidence.

    Or in this case, literally any evidence whatsoever.

    Take it a step further. If I'm going to base my morals and entire lifestyle on said extraordinary claims, then yes I'm going to need proof.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    So you'll never marry? A marriage change your life more than religion change most religious people's life. And there's no way to proof that your fiancé(e) loves you. There are signs, words, but they could all be lies.

    And you know… it's not because you're a religious person that you should “base [your] morals and entire lifestyle” on it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago* (1 child)

    The fuck are you even talking about? Really grasping at straws.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

    You said that you needed proofs to make life-altering choices. I gave you an example of a life-altering choice that couldn't be based on a proof of any kind: love can't be measured, weighted, proved, scientifically analyzed. And yet, we base our life choices on our belief that it exists in a person or not. And it's just one example.

    The scientific method is wonderful, one of the great creations of the human mind. But it's a tool. A tool that can be used to answer some questions, but not all questions. To try to solve existential questions with the scientific method is like to try to cut a steak with a hammer. It won't work, not because the hammer is a bad tool (it's a very good tool), just not the right one for the task.

    Now, religion may not be for you, and that's OK. It's great even! Not everyone need to be religious. What I don't understand is why everyone should necessarily have the same world understanding. Religious people are not dumb, atheist people aren't evil, and vice-versa. Theism and atheism are just two different legitimate ways to see the world. We can learn from each others instead of transforming everything into a cultural war…

  • source
  • parent