136
The Britannica entry for the Fediverse is really good (www.britannica.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago by to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
31 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

It isn't that surprising but it is somewhat surprising.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

How is the fediverse different from traditional social media?

The fediverse is a decentralized network of social media platforms that freely interact, unlike traditional social media.

I have a bit of a problem with the term "traditional social media".

The earliest popular form of social media was Usenet. The first one I ever used was web forums (run on phpBB or similar software). Those have a lot more "tradition" than Facebook or Twitter or TikTok, so why are they calling the latter three (deviations from the decentralized "tradition" of the Internet) "traditional social media"?! Is it just that they're the first form of social media that the authors of that article ever used?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 child)

    Those were not considered social media in their heyday as the term was created after them specifically for sites where a user would maintain a non-anonymous profile, post content about themselves and curating a feed based on other profiles followed.

    Forums and Usenet could be considered proto-social-media perhaps given they were clear precursors to it

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago

    Of course. I find "social media" a suboptimal term anyway. A good term for the concept is the "participatory Internet".

    But if we are going to use it, then it's just media that is produced by society at large as opposed to paid journalists or authors. Meaning Usenet is social media.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent