you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 2 weeks ago* (8 children)

Remember this energy when a fucking AI does it.

Edit: this isn’t pro AI, it’s pro who gives a fuck about the author, just to be clear.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 weeks ago* (4 children)

    AI don't think or have feelings (it's debatable whether they're even AI or that's just marketing BS). False equivalency.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    "AI" is kind of like the "No True Scotsman" fallacy. We've been through how many cycles of "If a computer can do , it must be AI." *Make a computer that does .* "That isn't how I meant. Now, if it can do ..." Of course, people have a hard time describing sentience and sapience, so why would it be a surprise that we have a hard time deciding if what we built sufficiently mimics them?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    We'll cross that bridge when we come to it. We haven't come to it. It's just a complexified chatbot they're calling AI for marketing purposes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    You are not pro AI, you are just anti being against AI?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    I’m for progress. Anyone with any decent edification on the subject knows that what we call “AI” is an LLM. The point is I don’t care if a solution comes from any source, be it the mathematical proofs LLMs have found, or a piece of software made by the furriest of furrys.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment