worked on it since 1998

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 25 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

I tried the "good UX" one back then when people hype around the update, and it still really hard to learn if you used to photoshop layout. These day, Krita is better i think, and Inkscape for the Illustrator alternative.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago

    Inkscape's UI is very unintuitive to me, as someone used to Illustrator. The necessary tools mostly exist, but not where I would look for them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

    > “if you used to photoshop layout”

    > look inside

    > same layout as in Photoshop, and the panels are movable

    By now I'm convinced Photoshop users lack pattern recognition.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Is it? Idk, it's been ages i used it and i never went back since even though every time i need it and people always recommended me it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

    It was bad when Gimp had floating windows. That was changed long ago. Since then, the layout is basically the same as in PS: tools on the left, layers on the right, the image in the middle. The biggest difference is probably that the tools panel isn't in one column by default and takes some screen space — but it can be resized, though idk about the minimum width.

  • source
  • parent