▲ 30 ▼ Maybe the problem is in us and not in the system? (i.redd.it) submitted 3 weeks ago by ooli3@sopuli.xyz to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.ca 50 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (8 children) It is. Which is why the 4th panel is Anarchism. permalink fedilink source hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -2 points 3 weeks ago (7 children) Feels like a bit of a self own, lol. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Eldritch@piefed.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (6 children) Youu're unintentionally right. When someone else doesn't own you or everyone else. Then you are actually free. So yeah, owning yourself and your own destiny. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -1 points 3 weeks ago (5 children) Owned v. owned, 0wned, pwned, 0wn3d, pwn3d, own3d. v. tr. To be made a fool of; To make a fool of; To confound or prove wrong; embarrasing someone: Being embarrased. I owned you in counter-strike. You were owned at the party yesterday. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Eldritch@piefed.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (4 children) Yes you don't understand it. We understand that. Though by your own definition you regularly own yourself too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -1 points 3 weeks ago (3 children) Checks out, an Anarchist™ would certainly be an advocate of self harm and self oppression. After all, the billionaires seem all for the idea, and they must be the smartest people on earth. /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Eldritch@piefed.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children) Go actually look up what anarchists believe and are for. If you want to make assumptions about them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) I don't think we have any large differences in ideal outcomes, just how to get there and to maintain it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Eldritch@piefed.world 1 point 3 weeks ago Nah, actually you don't disagree with most of them. Unless they're nihilist or extreme anarchist. Most anarchist at a base level don't want unanswerable government or business autocrats. Leninist and fascist are all about that sort of thing. The state above all. You can debate where that level is, or the destructive nature of electoralism. But I don't take you for a statist. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -2 points 3 weeks ago (7 children) Feels like a bit of a self own, lol. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Eldritch@piefed.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (6 children) Youu're unintentionally right. When someone else doesn't own you or everyone else. Then you are actually free. So yeah, owning yourself and your own destiny. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -1 points 3 weeks ago (5 children) Owned v. owned, 0wned, pwned, 0wn3d, pwn3d, own3d. v. tr. To be made a fool of; To make a fool of; To confound or prove wrong; embarrasing someone: Being embarrased. I owned you in counter-strike. You were owned at the party yesterday. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Eldritch@piefed.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (4 children) Yes you don't understand it. We understand that. Though by your own definition you regularly own yourself too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -1 points 3 weeks ago (3 children) Checks out, an Anarchist™ would certainly be an advocate of self harm and self oppression. After all, the billionaires seem all for the idea, and they must be the smartest people on earth. /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Eldritch@piefed.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children) Go actually look up what anarchists believe and are for. If you want to make assumptions about them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) I don't think we have any large differences in ideal outcomes, just how to get there and to maintain it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Eldritch@piefed.world 1 point 3 weeks ago Nah, actually you don't disagree with most of them. Unless they're nihilist or extreme anarchist. Most anarchist at a base level don't want unanswerable government or business autocrats. Leninist and fascist are all about that sort of thing. The state above all. You can debate where that level is, or the destructive nature of electoralism. But I don't take you for a statist. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (6 children) Youu're unintentionally right. When someone else doesn't own you or everyone else. Then you are actually free. So yeah, owning yourself and your own destiny. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -1 points 3 weeks ago (5 children) Owned v. owned, 0wned, pwned, 0wn3d, pwn3d, own3d. v. tr. To be made a fool of; To make a fool of; To confound or prove wrong; embarrasing someone: Being embarrased. I owned you in counter-strike. You were owned at the party yesterday. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Eldritch@piefed.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (4 children) Yes you don't understand it. We understand that. Though by your own definition you regularly own yourself too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -1 points 3 weeks ago (3 children) Checks out, an Anarchist™ would certainly be an advocate of self harm and self oppression. After all, the billionaires seem all for the idea, and they must be the smartest people on earth. /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Eldritch@piefed.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children) Go actually look up what anarchists believe and are for. If you want to make assumptions about them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) I don't think we have any large differences in ideal outcomes, just how to get there and to maintain it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Eldritch@piefed.world 1 point 3 weeks ago Nah, actually you don't disagree with most of them. Unless they're nihilist or extreme anarchist. Most anarchist at a base level don't want unanswerable government or business autocrats. Leninist and fascist are all about that sort of thing. The state above all. You can debate where that level is, or the destructive nature of electoralism. But I don't take you for a statist. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -1 points 3 weeks ago (5 children) Owned v. owned, 0wned, pwned, 0wn3d, pwn3d, own3d. v. tr. To be made a fool of; To make a fool of; To confound or prove wrong; embarrasing someone: Being embarrased. I owned you in counter-strike. You were owned at the party yesterday. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Eldritch@piefed.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (4 children) Yes you don't understand it. We understand that. Though by your own definition you regularly own yourself too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -1 points 3 weeks ago (3 children) Checks out, an Anarchist™ would certainly be an advocate of self harm and self oppression. After all, the billionaires seem all for the idea, and they must be the smartest people on earth. /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Eldritch@piefed.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children) Go actually look up what anarchists believe and are for. If you want to make assumptions about them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) I don't think we have any large differences in ideal outcomes, just how to get there and to maintain it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Eldritch@piefed.world 1 point 3 weeks ago Nah, actually you don't disagree with most of them. Unless they're nihilist or extreme anarchist. Most anarchist at a base level don't want unanswerable government or business autocrats. Leninist and fascist are all about that sort of thing. The state above all. You can debate where that level is, or the destructive nature of electoralism. But I don't take you for a statist. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (4 children) Yes you don't understand it. We understand that. Though by your own definition you regularly own yourself too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -1 points 3 weeks ago (3 children) Checks out, an Anarchist™ would certainly be an advocate of self harm and self oppression. After all, the billionaires seem all for the idea, and they must be the smartest people on earth. /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Eldritch@piefed.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children) Go actually look up what anarchists believe and are for. If you want to make assumptions about them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) I don't think we have any large differences in ideal outcomes, just how to get there and to maintain it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Eldritch@piefed.world 1 point 3 weeks ago Nah, actually you don't disagree with most of them. Unless they're nihilist or extreme anarchist. Most anarchist at a base level don't want unanswerable government or business autocrats. Leninist and fascist are all about that sort of thing. The state above all. You can debate where that level is, or the destructive nature of electoralism. But I don't take you for a statist. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -1 points 3 weeks ago (3 children) Checks out, an Anarchist™ would certainly be an advocate of self harm and self oppression. After all, the billionaires seem all for the idea, and they must be the smartest people on earth. /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Eldritch@piefed.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children) Go actually look up what anarchists believe and are for. If you want to make assumptions about them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) I don't think we have any large differences in ideal outcomes, just how to get there and to maintain it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Eldritch@piefed.world 1 point 3 weeks ago Nah, actually you don't disagree with most of them. Unless they're nihilist or extreme anarchist. Most anarchist at a base level don't want unanswerable government or business autocrats. Leninist and fascist are all about that sort of thing. The state above all. You can debate where that level is, or the destructive nature of electoralism. But I don't take you for a statist. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children) Go actually look up what anarchists believe and are for. If you want to make assumptions about them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) I don't think we have any large differences in ideal outcomes, just how to get there and to maintain it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Eldritch@piefed.world 1 point 3 weeks ago Nah, actually you don't disagree with most of them. Unless they're nihilist or extreme anarchist. Most anarchist at a base level don't want unanswerable government or business autocrats. Leninist and fascist are all about that sort of thing. The state above all. You can debate where that level is, or the destructive nature of electoralism. But I don't take you for a statist. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) I don't think we have any large differences in ideal outcomes, just how to get there and to maintain it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Eldritch@piefed.world 1 point 3 weeks ago Nah, actually you don't disagree with most of them. Unless they're nihilist or extreme anarchist. Most anarchist at a base level don't want unanswerable government or business autocrats. Leninist and fascist are all about that sort of thing. The state above all. You can debate where that level is, or the destructive nature of electoralism. But I don't take you for a statist. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 1 point 3 weeks ago Nah, actually you don't disagree with most of them. Unless they're nihilist or extreme anarchist. Most anarchist at a base level don't want unanswerable government or business autocrats. Leninist and fascist are all about that sort of thing. The state above all. You can debate where that level is, or the destructive nature of electoralism. But I don't take you for a statist. permalink fedilink source parent