984
Doing our part (lemmy.ca)
submitted 2 weeks ago by to c/memes@lemmy.world
143 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/72601186

Creator credit: https://tiktok.com/@twonkcomics

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 child)

Sponsored by UNESDA, the same association that fought for this in the first place. I picked the max value because it's 9 months old data. Surely by now it's even higher than the max.

Why are European associations and organizations writing such articles "an ad"? What exactly are they even advertising? That they themselves were wrong?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

    What do you mean by "faught for this"? UNESDA paid for a contract study against tethered caps so it is clearly not impartial on this, nor is the study.

    The report does not specify what this amount of extra plastic is supposed to be. A yearly rate? In any case, just taking randomly the larger number because the transition was 9 months ago is kindergarten math.

    The UNESDA isn't writing such an ad, it was buying that ad already over 6 years ago, in order to lobby against the law for tethered caps.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent