you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (1 child)

Agreed with both of your points above. But I don’t see how that supports your claim that original meme had no point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago*

    My point is that the meme is nonsensical because it depends on "loving" meaning "won't let animals be collateral damage." Or since it asks why a god would kill "so much" animals, maybe it has a permissible threshold that isn't mentioned. Either way, I'm officially past my not-worth-it-anymore threshold on this thread.

  • source
  • parent