14
B.C. Conservatives dump teenage candidate accused of making Hitler remarks (www.coastreporter.net)
submitted 3 weeks ago by to c/britishcolumbia@lemmy.ca
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (2 children)

But if you go by that standard, that means entire generations will be restricted from running for public office because of cringe shit they posted when they were kids and teens, and I would argue in their early 20s.

That reduces your candidate pool by a lot, which excludes a lot of otherwise talented people.

What's left in the candidate pool is the few who didn't engage in social media, and sociopaths and other abnormals who always posted the socially acceptable things.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    You're speaking like this precludes anybody who has ever posted something "cringe" from running, but there's a world of difference between someone who, 15 years ago, posted something embarrassing that they have had time and distance from, and this kid who is still a teenager who appears to have posted "Hitler "may have not intended death" during the Holocaust, and that "lots of Jews died" not because Hitler "hated them specifically" but because there were so many of them."

    He was removed by his own party, immediately, which also tells me that it's likely that these were both fairly recent posts, and that they were creditably attributed to this candidate.

    Sorry but a recent history of Holocaust denial, even if it's just an edgelord kid being an edgelord kid, is absolutely a valid reason for the party to revoke his candidacy. It doesn't preclude him from running, he just does not have the party endorsement or resources of the CPBC.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    In this particular case, yes, the former-candidate is still a teenager and therefore not distanced at all from the postings in question.

    But I was making a larger argument about how people of a younger age now have all of their immature words in writings and video recorded by social media in perpetuity, which can be used against them later in life.

    And it may impair them not just from seeking political office, but also job applications, promotions etc.

    You never know how these things are going to pop up on a background search or investigation.

    Even moreso that AI has been fed everything that has ever been posted online.

    I could imagine all one has to do is ask a chatbot, "Has Joe Candidate ever posted anything (insert controversial buzzwords here)?" and this kind of thing could be dredged up.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent