you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 3 weeks ago* (3 children)

You know, I upvoted because the title opinion is unpopular overall.

But I get the impression that this isn't so much an opinion as it is a statement of personal preference, which really isn't the same thing.

That's the thing though, we all like what we like. There's no real opinion involved in it. Either you dig a gentle screw against a wall, or you don't. You sploosh to being pinned against said wall and being used like a fleshlight, or you don't. There's zero objectiveness to position ratings, so cowgirl can't be over rated. It's just well loved by a lot of people, and you happen to not be one of them.

So, with that in mind, allow me to give you what I've picked up over my 30+ years of sex and talking about sex, regarding cowgirl.

On a purely physical level, the benefits are numerous for a woman. If said woman has a clitoris, even more benefits, even if something happened to remove or otherwise interfere with the external part of the clitoris, though that is one of the major benefits for women on average

See, the clit is the powerhouse of the cell genitals. Highest nerve density and sensitivity. That extends inwards, spreading around the vaginal canal. Where it splits is where the gspot is.

So, guess what cowgirl does for the clit. It allows the woman to completely control the speed, force, angle, and pressure if clitoral contact with the partner's mons pubis. The woman now has total freedom to maximize her pleasure, and likely while also giving plenty.

Then, the angle of entry and the ability to control the thrust means that that woman is now free to choose what depth she prefers, and exactly what portions of the vagina are most stimulates, be it the walls, the gspot (though reverse cowgirl can be better for that), the fornices, the cervix, or all of the above in some really rocking maneuvers.

Then, there's the freedom of access for hands to also stimulate her body. Breasts, neck, belly, there's a lot of territory that's way harder or impossible to get did when you're FDAU. It's also hard in missionary, though seated in a chair works quite well.

As long as both parties are well matched, that can even extend to oral stimulation of most of those places.

So, obviously, a lot of women are going to like it. Even very submissive women can be dominated in that position, assuming their partner has some experience and skill at mental domination without the need for physical controls. Imagine being used like a sex toy by having your breasts pulled, twisted, and otherwise manipulated, and even a very submissive masochist can have fun. Remember, our biggest erogenous zone is our brain. Tapping into that is what matters.

Which is why it's just fine that cowgirl isn't your thing. You respond to a range of physical control that pairs best when taken out of your visual perspective. Ain't no shame in that game.

Also, you seem to have the concept that cowgirl is bouncing up and down like and idiot. It can be. But it doesn't have to be. There's all sorts of controlled technique available. Slow grinds, circles, clenches, less pogotastic bouncing; all of which can be modified with a different angle that means fun for all the boys, girls, and others.

And, visually? Boobs. Bouncing or grinding, them tiddies is right there, dancing and schwiggling and undulating. Tiny tatas, or giant bazongas, they all dance wonderfully, and no position does them as much justice as cowgirl. That kind of view is amazing.

Besides that, there's the face. Sweaty or focused, watching a woman as she comes all over your cock? That's gold right there. And much harder to do when you're the one thrusting.

So, as nice as an ass is to slap, tickle, and watch ripple (or clap), there's more options to see in cowgirl.

I promise you, cowgirl can work for everyone. Doesn't even have to be cowgirl. Cowboys get a lot of the same benefits. From what I've been told, standard cowgirl position gives perfect prostate stimulation, though some leaning may be necessary.

Again though, you like what you like, and good for you. But, uh, overrated? Hell to the no.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] [S] 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)