105
[OC] Bottles and cans with a deposit are recycled much more often than those without (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 weeks ago by to c/dataisbeautiful@lemmy.world
34 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Reading this fairly. All ten deposit states are shown, not just the best ones. Their reported rates vary widely: Massachusetts is at 33%, Oregon (10¢) at 88%. Every state figure is above the 26% national non-deposit figure, but the measures and years differ, so this is not a like-for-like comparison (see below).

Different measures and years. Most state bars are calendar-year 2025 redemption rates for containers covered by each state’s deposit law; Hawaii’s is fiscal year 2024–25, and Iowa’s hatched bar is a 2022 recovery rate. The bottom two bars are 2021 U.S. recycling rates cited in CRI’s August 2026 release, and “not on deposit” includes non-deposit drinks sold inside deposit states. The bottom bars show the national gap between deposit and non-deposit containers; the state bars add context. None of this gives an Illinois-specific rate.

Connecticut rose from 65% to 92% in a year, following upgrades that included more return locations and a deposit increase from 5¢ to 10¢ in January 2024. CRI cautions that cross-border returns, claims of over-redemption by some distributors, and beverage sales that CRI estimates exceed what distributors report could all inflate the reported rate.

Iowa (hatched) is CRI’s 2022 “recovery rate,” which counts curbside and drop-off recycling as well as deposit redemptions, so it isn’t directly comparable to the redemption rates.

Sources

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

These days, deposits ought to be more like 25¢ at least, and it ought to be in all 50 states.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

    Why not kerbside pickup?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (9 children)

    I don't understand your question.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (8 children)

    You were suggesting a higher value for return but why return at all and not kerbside pickup like with other household waste.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago* (1 child)

    AFAIK, bottle deposits aren't for recycling, they're for reuse (which is better). It's about providing enough of an incentive to actually get those bottles sorted and delivered back into the supply chain (down to the same brand of drink, if it comes in a distinctive bottle like Coke does) correctly.

    Dumping everything in a bin mixed together to be roughly sorted, crushed, and melted down (or pulped) into new materials is a different process.

    I suppose you could have the municipal recycling people sort bottles for reuse, but then they'd still need to be able to get that deposit to make it worth their while.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago*

    AFAIK, bottle deposits aren’t for recycling, they’re for reuse (which is better). It’s about providing enough of an incentive to actually get those bottles sorted and delivered back into the supply chain (down to the same brand of drink, if it comes in a distinctive bottle like Coke does) correctly.

    They're definitely for recycling here. They get crushed in the machine after they're scanned.

    I suppose you could have the municipal recycling people sort bottles for reuse, but then they’d still need to be able to get that deposit to make it worth their while.

    Not everything needs to be about money but also the amount of people who don't get their deposit back is actually loads. People are mostly lazy and it's a hassle to get it. Plus you don't get money, you get a receipt and you can only spend it in one shop or your have to go to the till and ask them to change it into cash for you.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (5 children)

    I'm not the person you were answering to.

    But I'm still not sure what you are suggesting.

    If you mean just put bottles in with other waste, then the reason is that people will litter.

    If you mean have bottles with a deposit collected curbside, I'm not sure how your suggestion would work. You'd leave a container filled with valuable goods on the side of the road and not expect it to get stolen? 🤔

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    If you mean just put bottles in with other waste, then the reason is that people will litter.

    I'm talking about the normal practice of household waste pickup. People who litter are still going to litter, they're not thinking about it.

    If you mean have bottles with a deposit collected curbside, I’m not sure how your suggestion would work. You’d leave a container filled with valuable goods on the side of the road and not expect it to get stolen?

    No, I don't mean that.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    People who litter are still going to litter, they're not thinking about it.

    That's a reasonable hypothesis, but unsupported by data:

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344924005536

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    I'm trying to find where it talks about reduction in litter. I even asked their ai assistant but didn't get it there. Can you see it?

    Thanks for the link though, it's a good one and I'll probably read the whole thing today. I've skimmed through most of it, it seems fairly comprehensive.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    The core principle is to provide consumers with a rebate or refund of the surcharge added to the beverage product at the point of purchase when the packaging is returned to a designated collection point once emptied (Calabrese et al., 2021; Krzywda, 2022; Malindzakova et al., 2022; Walls, 2011; Zhou et al., 2020). Zhou et al. (2020) and Malindzakova et al. (2022) suggest that DRS can serve several functions within the waste management system. Specifically, they can: 1) increase the quality and quantity of collected materials and reduce littering; 2) contribute to high collection rates of valuable and recyclable materials; and 3) shift costs and responsibilities associated with the product's end-of-life phase from municipalities to producers, emphasizing the importance of Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) regulations.

    There are 7 papers listed in the meta analysis i posted which should address litter.

    I literally just searched for "litter" and this was the second hit.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •