Heads up, if you use home assistant, any credentials in your config have been hoovered up without your knowledge

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 37 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

No, your credentials have not been "hoovered up". A hash is not reversible, and a partial hash would match far too many potential passwords to be any more accurate than random guesses.

Still, uploading any data, especially identifying data, should absolutely not be enabled by default.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    it only send the first 5 characters of the sha1 hash, thats pretty much useless for finding the password

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

    This is such a nothing burger, they’re using those first five to get partial matches then doing the actual checks locally on the hash…

    To be transparent: this check isn't new, it has been part of the Supervisor for years. It checks app options that are marked as passwords. A recent release fixed the warning that surfaces it, which is why you're seeing it now. Privacy was a design requirement for this feature from the start, which is why your secrets never leave your system. The Supervisor hashes them locally and sends only the first 5 characters of the SHA-1 hash to Have I Been Pwned. HIBP returns every hash starting with that prefix, and the matching happens on your own instance. You can see exactly what it does here: https://github.com/home-assistant/supervisor/blob/main/supervisor/utils/pwned.py. You are right that our documentation should have explained this, including how to turn it off. We'll get that page updated. ../Frenck

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] [S] -40 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    They have been hoovered up, by home assistant. I made no claim, nor did the source, that clear-text credentials were shipped anywhere.

    This is meant to drive awareness on a transparency and dev issue, not an overt compromise. My language was maybe a bit too inflammatory though, I suppose.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    So for as far as I understand it:

    Yes, this is a big issue on the developers part as this should not have happened without consent.

    No, this is not a direct security breach for every and all home assistant users. You do not need to immediately change all your passwords (due to it being partial hashes)

    Did I understand correctly? I'm not that deep into how all this works as I am mostly a enthusiast user without a lot of computer science knowledge

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 3 weeks ago

    No to both.

    Its a long-standing and documented feature. Included in that documentation is how to turn it off, which was added a few years back iirc.

    Its brought up every once in a while by people.who don't understand cryptographic hashes or the hibp tools. Usually with a bunch of posts about how passwords are being leaked (they aren't).

  • source
  • parent