you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 16 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)
  • [–] 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    It's also literally how supply and demand work. Demand for the medicine is increasing, thus they raise the price. No ethics needed. That's why it's fucked up. Capitalism doesn't consider the drug addicts less worth - it doesn't consider them at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 5 points 3 weeks ago
    [removed by mod]
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago (-1 children)

    That’s not true. Look at similar spikes in insulin and other lifesaving medicines, for example.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow -1 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)
    [removed by mod]
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (-1 children)

    We have plenty of capacity to make all the insulin we need and more, it's a more profitable business when there's short supply. We have an infinite capacity for greed.

    Exactly, that is free market capitalism.

    What agenda do you think drove the "masks are for sissies" COVID response?

    That one I’m not sure about, but I can’t think of a way it’s money related. However, the prevalence and cost of masks definitely went up during the pandemic, as most people did mask up. Some other supplies also went up in price, like microphones and cameras for computers as everyone started working from home.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow -1 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 3 weeks ago
    [removed by mod]
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (-1 children)

    That wasn't my experience in Floriduh.

    It depends heavily on the location. It was basically split right down party lines. Blue areas were like 90% masked, red areas were like 90% unmasked.

    Just use the tiniest bit of imagination....

    I’m trying not to stoop to the level of conspiracy theories. Even so, I don’t think your explanation makes any sense. How would the younger generations, especially those without money, contribute to the right wing propaganda that championed anti-masking ideas? Not to mention that most people care about their relatives for more than just their money.

    The whole anti-masking things makes more sense to me as part of the long-running trend of anti-science propaganda from the right. Maybe that’s driven by oil companies because anti-science attitudes drive climate change denialism. But it also might just be the effects of the social issues that spun off of these things.

    One curious anechdote - my dad was heavily questioning masking during COVID but I don’t remember him questioning masking when our town was full of smoke from wildfires from a few hundred miles north.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow -1 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-2 replies)
  • load more comments (-2 replies)
  • load more comments (-2 replies)
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago

    I read your other comments and you seem informed and aware of a lot, I just don't see how you can reflect on such and decide it isn't ultimately driven by capitalism?

    All of the "othering" you've witnessed and are (I think accurately) describing - that human tendency toward incoherent tribalistic behaviors and worldviews - that's baked into us, no disagreement there. But it's the capitalists who leverage it so successfully against us all and have made it the force that it is, here and today.

    Like yeah the phenomena is real pretty much as you're describing, and it results from, is intentionally amplified by (doesn't just incidentally feed into) the way we are choosing to run our society. Capitalism + basic human nature = what we're all watching.

    Not being a jerk. How does capitalism get off the hook as a primary cause here?

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    You seem to just be using your own definitions of capitalism and communism. It's probably not worth bickering much about, but what you're saying doesn't make sense. Not in the way where I think you're wrong and I disagree, in the way that your argument isn't coherent enough to refute.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 1 point 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 0 points 3 weeks ago

    Labels like capitalism and communism are more window dressing than actual function

    Nah fam. There's no point in labeling sets of ideas if they're rendered useless the moment they diverge from your imagined "pure" form. Being more complicated in practice than just a simple textbook definition doesn't mean they aren't "that" defined thing, it means textbook definitions are always fundamentally weak and flawed. Oversimplifications, models used to describe, not blueprints used to build.

    Capitalism is roughly everywhere, underpinning everything globally because of its roaring success. Communism is roughly nowhere, for the same reasons of capitalism's overwhelming power.

    The distinctions exist and matter.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-2 replies)
  • load more comments (-2 replies)
  • load more comments (-2 replies)
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    How is this not capitalism? I'd love to hear the rationale there...

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-2 replies)