โฒ 905 โผ Breaking news!! (lemmy.zip) submitted 4 weeks ago by Maven@lemmy.zip to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev 58 comments fedilink hide all child comments ๐ 6
[โ] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 22 points 4 weeks ago (8 children) "See? I told you this lunix (sic) is dangerous!" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [โ] rumba@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 weeks ago (5 children) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [โ] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 1 point 4 weeks ago (4 children) This wasn't a real ad, now was it? and do I want to know the answer to this? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [โ] rumba@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 weeks ago (3 children) I was there when it hit the net. Supposedly, it was real, but only ran in Germany. I retrieved the copy from http://xahlee.info/UnixResource_dir/microsoft_linux_ad.html, but I can attest that it at least existed around 2000. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [โ] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 weeks ago (2 children) Lovely :) But ok. It was win-server vs linux. At this time must've been WIN-NT or 2003. Both actually way better than their consumer OS. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 child) NT4 was solid operationally. Stability was close enough. NT4's Deskop manager was more professional but rather inflexible. Apache in Linux was superior to NT4+IIS in every way. NT4 could run Exchange which was generally better than unix mail. Most of the reason we ran Windows servers was because we knew Windows. The whole compile your stuff and stay on top of deps was beyond normal for the time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 weeks ago Most of the reasons for me were lazyness. Everything was based on a win-domain and I never bothered giving that up ๐ But now I'm left with one 2022-server and 20 mixed Linux. permalink fedilink source parent [โ] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 child) The funniest part of your comment is that you could not let Linux be misspelled without a correction, even though that's the joke. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 weeks ago Hence the preemptive sic ๐ permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] rumba@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 weeks ago (5 children) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [โ] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 1 point 4 weeks ago (4 children) This wasn't a real ad, now was it? and do I want to know the answer to this? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [โ] rumba@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 weeks ago (3 children) I was there when it hit the net. Supposedly, it was real, but only ran in Germany. I retrieved the copy from http://xahlee.info/UnixResource_dir/microsoft_linux_ad.html, but I can attest that it at least existed around 2000. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [โ] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 weeks ago (2 children) Lovely :) But ok. It was win-server vs linux. At this time must've been WIN-NT or 2003. Both actually way better than their consumer OS. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 child) NT4 was solid operationally. Stability was close enough. NT4's Deskop manager was more professional but rather inflexible. Apache in Linux was superior to NT4+IIS in every way. NT4 could run Exchange which was generally better than unix mail. Most of the reason we ran Windows servers was because we knew Windows. The whole compile your stuff and stay on top of deps was beyond normal for the time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 weeks ago Most of the reasons for me were lazyness. Everything was based on a win-domain and I never bothered giving that up ๐ But now I'm left with one 2022-server and 20 mixed Linux. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 1 point 4 weeks ago (4 children) This wasn't a real ad, now was it? and do I want to know the answer to this? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [โ] rumba@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 weeks ago (3 children) I was there when it hit the net. Supposedly, it was real, but only ran in Germany. I retrieved the copy from http://xahlee.info/UnixResource_dir/microsoft_linux_ad.html, but I can attest that it at least existed around 2000. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [โ] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 weeks ago (2 children) Lovely :) But ok. It was win-server vs linux. At this time must've been WIN-NT or 2003. Both actually way better than their consumer OS. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 child) NT4 was solid operationally. Stability was close enough. NT4's Deskop manager was more professional but rather inflexible. Apache in Linux was superior to NT4+IIS in every way. NT4 could run Exchange which was generally better than unix mail. Most of the reason we ran Windows servers was because we knew Windows. The whole compile your stuff and stay on top of deps was beyond normal for the time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 weeks ago Most of the reasons for me were lazyness. Everything was based on a win-domain and I never bothered giving that up ๐ But now I'm left with one 2022-server and 20 mixed Linux. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] rumba@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 weeks ago (3 children) I was there when it hit the net. Supposedly, it was real, but only ran in Germany. I retrieved the copy from http://xahlee.info/UnixResource_dir/microsoft_linux_ad.html, but I can attest that it at least existed around 2000. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [โ] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 weeks ago (2 children) Lovely :) But ok. It was win-server vs linux. At this time must've been WIN-NT or 2003. Both actually way better than their consumer OS. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 child) NT4 was solid operationally. Stability was close enough. NT4's Deskop manager was more professional but rather inflexible. Apache in Linux was superior to NT4+IIS in every way. NT4 could run Exchange which was generally better than unix mail. Most of the reason we ran Windows servers was because we knew Windows. The whole compile your stuff and stay on top of deps was beyond normal for the time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 weeks ago Most of the reasons for me were lazyness. Everything was based on a win-domain and I never bothered giving that up ๐ But now I'm left with one 2022-server and 20 mixed Linux. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 weeks ago (2 children) Lovely :) But ok. It was win-server vs linux. At this time must've been WIN-NT or 2003. Both actually way better than their consumer OS. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 child) NT4 was solid operationally. Stability was close enough. NT4's Deskop manager was more professional but rather inflexible. Apache in Linux was superior to NT4+IIS in every way. NT4 could run Exchange which was generally better than unix mail. Most of the reason we ran Windows servers was because we knew Windows. The whole compile your stuff and stay on top of deps was beyond normal for the time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 weeks ago Most of the reasons for me were lazyness. Everything was based on a win-domain and I never bothered giving that up ๐ But now I'm left with one 2022-server and 20 mixed Linux. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 child) NT4 was solid operationally. Stability was close enough. NT4's Deskop manager was more professional but rather inflexible. Apache in Linux was superior to NT4+IIS in every way. NT4 could run Exchange which was generally better than unix mail. Most of the reason we ran Windows servers was because we knew Windows. The whole compile your stuff and stay on top of deps was beyond normal for the time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 weeks ago Most of the reasons for me were lazyness. Everything was based on a win-domain and I never bothered giving that up ๐ But now I'm left with one 2022-server and 20 mixed Linux. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 weeks ago Most of the reasons for me were lazyness. Everything was based on a win-domain and I never bothered giving that up ๐ But now I'm left with one 2022-server and 20 mixed Linux. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 child) The funniest part of your comment is that you could not let Linux be misspelled without a correction, even though that's the joke. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 weeks ago Hence the preemptive sic ๐ permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 weeks ago Hence the preemptive sic ๐ permalink fedilink source parent