▲ -17 ▼ Solo developer rebuilds Adobe Creative Suite in Rust using Claude, releases it free to all — targets 100% parity in one month despite piracy claims and safety warnings (www.tomshardware.com) submitted 4 weeks ago by themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world 9 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Throbbing_banjo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 4 weeks ago (5 children) Yes we've all heard about slop-o-shop by now permalink fedilink source hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 10 points 4 weeks ago (3 children) Would still prefer it over fucking adobe cloud-shit though. Hate aside. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 weeks ago (2 children) See how compatible it actually is, when there's no way any meaningful regression testing could have happened in that timeframe. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] belochka@lemmy.world 14 points 4 weeks ago ... but he prompted it "make no mistakes" ... permalink fedilink source parent [–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 weeks ago Ok that wouldn't phase me personally, but sure would matter. But which serious company would employ such slop-ware, even if it would save serious bucks. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 weeks ago Mmmm Adobe subscriptionless Copyright-Law-Slurry slop 🤤🤤🤤 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 10 points 4 weeks ago (3 children) Would still prefer it over fucking adobe cloud-shit though. Hate aside. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 weeks ago (2 children) See how compatible it actually is, when there's no way any meaningful regression testing could have happened in that timeframe. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] belochka@lemmy.world 14 points 4 weeks ago ... but he prompted it "make no mistakes" ... permalink fedilink source parent [–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 weeks ago Ok that wouldn't phase me personally, but sure would matter. But which serious company would employ such slop-ware, even if it would save serious bucks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 weeks ago (2 children) See how compatible it actually is, when there's no way any meaningful regression testing could have happened in that timeframe. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] belochka@lemmy.world 14 points 4 weeks ago ... but he prompted it "make no mistakes" ... permalink fedilink source parent [–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 weeks ago Ok that wouldn't phase me personally, but sure would matter. But which serious company would employ such slop-ware, even if it would save serious bucks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] belochka@lemmy.world 14 points 4 weeks ago ... but he prompted it "make no mistakes" ... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 weeks ago Ok that wouldn't phase me personally, but sure would matter. But which serious company would employ such slop-ware, even if it would save serious bucks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 weeks ago Mmmm Adobe subscriptionless Copyright-Law-Slurry slop 🤤🤤🤤 permalink fedilink source parent