▲ 487 ▼ Mac Users Are Nuking Every Trace of Apple AI on Their Machines: Sayonara useless AI features, and hello disk space. (futurism.com) submitted 4 weeks ago by eicker@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 51 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] yestalgia@lemmy.world 17 points 4 weeks ago (7 children) I think you mean Tim Apple permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] f314@lemmy.world 19 points 4 weeks ago (5 children) It’s John Apple now! (Tim Cook resigned. John Ternus is the current CEO of Apple) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Bryllyg 10 points 4 weeks ago (2 children) What if it's a Dread Pirate Roberts situation, and every subsequent Apple CEO automatically becomes "Tim Apple"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 child) Then they should definitely all be Steve Apple. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 3 points 4 weeks ago No, for two reasons. First, there are already two Steve Apples, from the same time, no less. Second, because we don't really want one of those Steves back. Great marketer, shit person. permalink fedilink source parent [–] quantumcrop@lemmy.today 3 points 4 weeks ago I like the idea of Apple's leadership working on a princess bride model. Tim Apple is simply a title that gets handed down permalink fedilink source parent [–] reddig33@lemmy.world 1 point 4 weeks ago Tim didn’t really resign/retire. They promoted him to Chairman. https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/10/11/tim-cook-visits-china-for-the-third-time-in-2026 permalink fedilink source parent [–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 weeks ago Ah woops you beat me to it! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] f314@lemmy.world 19 points 4 weeks ago (5 children) It’s John Apple now! (Tim Cook resigned. John Ternus is the current CEO of Apple) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Bryllyg 10 points 4 weeks ago (2 children) What if it's a Dread Pirate Roberts situation, and every subsequent Apple CEO automatically becomes "Tim Apple"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 child) Then they should definitely all be Steve Apple. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 3 points 4 weeks ago No, for two reasons. First, there are already two Steve Apples, from the same time, no less. Second, because we don't really want one of those Steves back. Great marketer, shit person. permalink fedilink source parent [–] quantumcrop@lemmy.today 3 points 4 weeks ago I like the idea of Apple's leadership working on a princess bride model. Tim Apple is simply a title that gets handed down permalink fedilink source parent [–] reddig33@lemmy.world 1 point 4 weeks ago Tim didn’t really resign/retire. They promoted him to Chairman. https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/10/11/tim-cook-visits-china-for-the-third-time-in-2026 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bryllyg 10 points 4 weeks ago (2 children) What if it's a Dread Pirate Roberts situation, and every subsequent Apple CEO automatically becomes "Tim Apple"? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 child) Then they should definitely all be Steve Apple. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 3 points 4 weeks ago No, for two reasons. First, there are already two Steve Apples, from the same time, no less. Second, because we don't really want one of those Steves back. Great marketer, shit person. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 child) Then they should definitely all be Steve Apple. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 3 points 4 weeks ago No, for two reasons. First, there are already two Steve Apples, from the same time, no less. Second, because we don't really want one of those Steves back. Great marketer, shit person. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 3 points 4 weeks ago No, for two reasons. First, there are already two Steve Apples, from the same time, no less. Second, because we don't really want one of those Steves back. Great marketer, shit person. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] quantumcrop@lemmy.today 3 points 4 weeks ago I like the idea of Apple's leadership working on a princess bride model. Tim Apple is simply a title that gets handed down permalink fedilink source parent
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 1 point 4 weeks ago Tim didn’t really resign/retire. They promoted him to Chairman. https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/10/11/tim-cook-visits-china-for-the-third-time-in-2026 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 weeks ago Ah woops you beat me to it! permalink fedilink source parent