Latest outburst comes as his push to rebrand the emerging technology increasingly falls flat

Donald Trump on Thursday opened up a new front in his ongoing war against commonly used terms and geographic names by warning that anyone referring to Large Language Models such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT or Anthropic’s Claude as “Artificial Intelligence” would earn themselves a place on his enemies list.

Writing on Truth Social, he declared that the White House “considers anyone that uses the term, ‘Artificial Intelligence,’ as opposed to the highly accepted new and more accurate term, ‘Super Intelligence,’ THE ENEMY!”

The president’s outburst-cum-veiled threat landed just over a week after he signed an executive order directing executive branch agencies to begin referring to artificial intelligence, which is now embedded across the federal government, as “super intelligence” following a lunch with leaders in the AI industry, including Elon Musk, Sundar Pichai, Dario Amodei and others.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 58 points 1 month ago (15 children)

Stop trying to make super intelligence happen.

It's not going to happen.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    It's a computer. It's ones and zeros following a program. It will NEVER have intelligence.

    It is technically Artificial Stupidity. There is NO I.Q there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    IQ is just a measure of pattern recognition. An AI can do that well. Our brains are just like computer, with neurons instead of matrices. Our brains are just way more complex. It's hard to define intelligence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Our brains are electro-chemical. Not just like a computer.

    The chemicals are what "decided" to make or break a connection. No digital machine is going to emulate that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    The brain is just a different machine.

    And of course digital systems can emulate analogue systems.

    Not that that's a prerequisite for intelligence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    The two super computers that the NWS uses to predict the weather are consistently at odds with each other.

    Same program, same input, different output.

    When things get real complicated, things start behaving unpredictably.

    Then you have entropy. That machine is heading for the junkyard. How many repairs will you tolerate?

    If it's really, really complicated, how will you know it's broken?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    Can you people stop embarrassing yourselves? We get it, you don't like LLMs. But we've been calling shitty things AI for a long time. It was "AI" when Skyrim NPCs assumed it must have been the wind that shot their fellow guards.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    There is a very good reason I don't like them.

    Rich people don't have "talent". They rent or buy talent.

    A.I. (LLMs) allows "wealth" to access "talent" without letting talent access wealth.

    That is WHY the rich want A.I.

    Now what rich person would NOT want that?

    And what poor person would want that?

    See the problem yet?

    The rich (people that own LLMs) are NOT stealing your money, they are stealing "what you are worth" (a living wage).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 weeks ago*

    Yes, yes, we get it.

    A.I. (LLMs)

    Not all generative AI models are LLMs, in fact what modt people immediately think of outside of tech/development is image and audio generation, which is why a catchall term has been generally agreed.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 weeks ago

    No, no, we just need an executive order requiring federal agencies use the term, then the Library of Congress will update the LOC subject headings and the college libraries will (by default) adopt the new subject headings and it'll be so much fun /s

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I'll be willing to compromise on Super Fetch Intelligence

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    That's so fetch!

    (I have no idea what "fetch" means as a slang term, but I've always wanted an excuse to use it in a sentence so thank you for giving me the opportunity.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    It's short for fetching

    fetching/fĕch′ĭng/

    adjective

    Very attractive; charming.

    "a fetching new hairstyle."

    Drawing favorable attention.

    "a fetching new hat"

    Similar: appealingtakingwinning

    Attractive; pleasant to regard.

  • source
  • parent