fyi: it's "drugs"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

Am I the only one to find it a turn off?

I do too, but "what do I find a turn off" and "what do I think is the line that must be proven before someone can be thrown in a cage, and to what standard do I think it must be shown and what things do I think work in the accused's defense" are...not the same thing?

Given this is presumably in the context of the Cornell 7, that case has a lot of details that I think makes the whole thing fuzzier than any of the cut and dried summaries imply, and that's just from what's been aired publicly - there's certainly more beneath that that isn't public.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    I will try to find Cornell 7, I don't know about it yet...

    Also, I think there are two lines, one is the legal minimum and those who play under it are a danger for society, the cage is as far as I know the best we have for them. But there is an other line over which one may feel really happy and have happy partner(s).

    I wish to call for playing above the second.

  • source
  • parent