I replied to someone saying that the USSR defeated the Nazis saying that it was a group effort. Got into an argument and called a Nazi repeatedly because "I was mad that the USSR defeated the Nazis and hated them for it" which is ridiculous. This isn't the first time that's happened on Lemmy. What's up with that?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (17 children)

Was this ml? I was banned for saying NATO was a defensive alliance.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    "Damn, how'd our planes wind up in Libya? Well, I guess we have to defend ourselves against the ground in case it attacks. What luck that our planes just happen to be loaded up with bombs!"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (4 children)
  • [+] -6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Is not actually a reply when someone literally provides proof that you are wrong.

    Proving something is false in math literally only requires a single counter-example.

    That counter example was given. You're just too childish to admit you're wrong.

    And what is especially funny is you lump everyone that disagrees with you as a tankie. Your childishness not allowing you to recognize that multiple different ideological views can lead to the same conclusion.

    Libertarians and Communists can actually agree on some small things. the fact that they do doesn't make them the same.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    If you are in a 'defensive alliance' with a bunch of countries that regularly engage in aggressive overseas invasions, ones in which you frequently if not always help and provide support. Then I'm sorry to inform you that you are in an 'offensive alliance'.

    Most NATO countries have in some way helped with Trump's mindless war on Iran (I mean heck, Spain is basically famous for being the only one who won't). You have to admit there's nothing defensive about that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -28 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    thats because its not its an imperialist tool with nothing defensive about it, lib worlders man 😒

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (5 children)
  • [+] -19 points 1 month ago* (4 children)

    Points to guy that is completely correct "Haha, get a load of this guy!"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [+] -16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    points at guy that is completely correct "Get a load of this guy!"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (1 child)
    • one month old account
    • every comment is repeating tankie talking points

    Bro you're not beating the allegations

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -14 points 1 month ago*

    Literally migrated instances because of midwest.social having performance/federation issues. But your account is younger than Trump first taking power in the US and putting loyalists in the US government, so...

  • source
  • parent