▲ 183 ▼ People are asking ChatGPT to help them decide how to vote in the midterms (www.npr.org) submitted 1 month ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 49 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] grapefruittrouble@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago (5 children) Is this not what it was designed for? permalink fedilink source hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 8 points 1 month ago* (3 children) Not with the monied interests in charge of its operation. They want people to depend upon the big AIs for answers to everything so they can subtly guide the populace's "thinking" and control them like the sheep most of them are. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Dojan@pawb.social 2 points 1 month ago (2 children) Yes, that’s what the comment was saying. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Could be interpreted either way, I suppose - it was extremely vague. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] grapefruittrouble@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 month ago I did mean it that way haha permalink fedilink source parent [–] Zomg@piefed.world 3 points 1 month ago When the companies can adjust the weights and responses to be more soft or critical to topics, you can't exactly trust that it isn't unbias some how. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 8 points 1 month ago* (3 children) Not with the monied interests in charge of its operation. They want people to depend upon the big AIs for answers to everything so they can subtly guide the populace's "thinking" and control them like the sheep most of them are. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Dojan@pawb.social 2 points 1 month ago (2 children) Yes, that’s what the comment was saying. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Could be interpreted either way, I suppose - it was extremely vague. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] grapefruittrouble@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 month ago I did mean it that way haha permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dojan@pawb.social 2 points 1 month ago (2 children) Yes, that’s what the comment was saying. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Could be interpreted either way, I suppose - it was extremely vague. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] grapefruittrouble@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 month ago I did mean it that way haha permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Could be interpreted either way, I suppose - it was extremely vague. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] grapefruittrouble@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 month ago I did mean it that way haha permalink fedilink source parent
[–] grapefruittrouble@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 month ago I did mean it that way haha permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zomg@piefed.world 3 points 1 month ago When the companies can adjust the weights and responses to be more soft or critical to topics, you can't exactly trust that it isn't unbias some how. permalink fedilink source parent