you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 42 points 1 month ago (10 children)

I assume that people drop out as they get tired. Eventually, there's few enough people involved that it just no longer counts as an orgy. At that exact moment, some people are still going, but the orgy has ended.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    I suppose now the question is what's the minimum number of people to classify it as an orgy. 5 is my best guess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago (8 children)

    That sounds right. I've heard of a threesome. I've heard of a foursome. Never heard of a fivesome. Because that's when it becomes and orgy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    But what about if it’s a gangbang instead?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    So an orgy would need to have 5 people with either 3 genders or at least people of 2 genders.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    Noting the charge levied in another comment on this, I'd amend to 5 people with a minimum of two bottoms.

    A group of 5 people with 4 tops and 1 bottom probably changes the classification to a gangbang. 1 top and 4 bottoms, a reverse gangbang (and likely tricky to pull off). 2 tops and 3 bottoms, or 3 tops and 2 bottoms, would seem to form the minimum unit to be classified as an orgy. However, further study is needed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments